Cholangiocarcinoma – three different diseases

Discussion Board Forums General Discussion Cholangiocarcinoma – three different diseases

Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #83801
    marions
    Moderator

    Duke….the recorded webinar is accessible with this link:
    http://cholangiocarcinoma.org/webinar-update-on-cholangiocarcinoma-what-we-have-learned-from-the-international-hepatobiliary-neoplasia-biorepository/
    It is recorded and available for viewing at any time.
    The restaging (classification) is important in that clinical trials not only strategize the individual groups, but hopefully accrue large volume s of patients for further studies specific to their disease group. This, in combination with each patient’s particular molecular behavior will allow for a clearer picture and targeted treatments. How quickly will this come about? That I don’t know however; research for this cancer has increased dramatically over the last few years and in the near future, I expect it to accelerate accordingly. The greater the understanding of this disease, the closer we come to early detection for CCA.
    Slide 32 – rate of survival for perihilar CCA – not sure what data has been used for the analyses. But we must remember that it is retrospective, based on previous cases encompassing previous treatment options re-classified in three different disease presentations.
    Once universally accepted, the new classification will lead to further, current analyses.
    Hugs,
    Marion

    #83800
    dukenukem
    Member

    I’m sorry I missed the webinar. There had to be so much more information presented – typical of PowerPoint presentations.

    Did they give any time frames for when this information may get factored into treatment plans?

    Any information about being able to detect at an earlier stage?

    Slide 32 – “Survival of pCCA Patients …”. When will they have a similar slide for iCCA patients?

    Duke

    #83799
    marions
    Moderator

    Rob….I believe it to be best to focus on you, an individual with this disease, your own path, your own disease presentation and your personal response to treatments. Statistics are necessary in order to achieve generalized results, but it is focused on a target population not necessarily representing you. It is for that reason that I shy away from paying too much attention to the outcome of a statistical analysis.

    Nine years ago when first I became involved in the NCI research advocacy for clinical trials for HCC and CCA, the overall consensus within the medical community was that CCA is comprised of different diseases. It was suspected but was not backed up by medical findings. This has changed in that we now have evidence that on a molecular level although similar, CCA behaves very differently in these three subgroups: Intrahepatic, Distal, and Hilar (Klatskin.) The re-classification of this cancer is of extreme importance for research, as it carries over to treatment for the patient population.
    Hugs,
    Marion

    #83798
    robjk
    Member

    Thanks Marion,
    Anyone know how the new survival rates compare to the old survival rates? I really don’t like the looks of the new ones, they seem lower?

    Thanks, Rob

    #83797
    gavin
    Moderator

    Thanks for the reminder of the latest presentation Marion, I still have to watch the webinar! Been so busy here.

    Hugs,

    Gavin

    #10356
    marions
    Moderator

    You might want to take a look at the presentation:
    What We Have Learned From The International Hepatobiliary Neoplasia Registry.
    http://cholangiocarcinoma.org/webinar-update-on-cholangiocarcinoma-what-we-have-learned-from-the-international-hepatobiliary-neoplasia-biorepository/

    You may either watch or consider downloading the power point presentation.

    The new classifications: intrahepatic, distal, and hilar leads us to understand that CCA is not a single disease rather, that it is a combination of three separate diseases.

    On a molecular level we see many similarities but very distinct differences as well.
    This may help explain why some people respond well to a particular treatment whereas other patients benefit slightly or some do not benefit at all.

    Ultimately, we expect to see different treatment modalities focused on each disease group.

    Hugs,
    Marion

Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • The forum ‘General Discussion’ is closed to new topics and replies.