Adjuvant chemo- or radiotherapy?
Discussion Board › Forums › General Discussion › Adjuvant chemo- or radiotherapy?
- This topic has 29 replies, 6 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 1 month ago by pcl1029.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 17, 2011 at 5:11 pm #54322pcl1029Member
Hi,Richard,
You are a good researcher,the reason I said this is -you have a desire to carefully learn and know about this horrible disease so you can take care of your wife in advance to the possible outcome in the future. I salute you on this.
Yes, there are benefit for adjuvant therapy for patients with R0 or R1 margin;but the duration of chemotherapy of 6 month may not be enough to prevent the recurrence.
Additional radiation therapy may add additional survival benefit to CCA patients
Clinical trail whenever possible is also recommended by NCCN and ESMO.
ps. please read my reply to your e mail today for more info.
God bless.November 17, 2011 at 1:29 pm #54321richardlMemberAlthough only a preliminary result, this abstract, presented at the NCRI Conference in Liverpool (England) last week, goes some way to answer the question posed by this thread:
http://www.ncri.org.uk/ncriconference/2011abstracts/abstracts/PP39.html
Conclusion: There is a benefit for adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with clear resection margins (using, in this trial, GEM or 5-FU/FA).
However, it raises many questions, some of which I will try to get answered.
November 10, 2011 at 7:59 pm #54320gavinModeratorHi Percy,
For sure I will say hi to my mum from you. And yep, our Bears are on a roll and lets hope we roll over these Lions on Sunday! Although we could do without a resurgent Lions team in our division this year! Just checked the odds and we’re still 33/1 for the superbowl, thats what I got before the season started! 16/1 for the NFC and 49’ers are 13/2 right now. Go Bears!
And Pecry, please do not feel bad with regards to helping people. You give a tremendous amount of help to everyone here and I know how much that is appreciated by everyone. You have no reason at all to feel bad about the help you give. You take it easy now, and if we win on Sunday I’ll tell my mum to send you
November 10, 2011 at 5:43 pm #54319pcl1029MemberHi,Kate,
“I wonder if it makes a difference that with Richard’s wife we are talking about adjuvant therapy with negative margins. “
Yes, according to ESMO(European society of Medical Oncology) guidelines. they suggested either supportive care or palliative chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy after a noncurative resection of CCA (intra and extra)and consideration of postoperatvie chemoradioptherapy as an option after complete surgical resection. But the NCCN guidelines(National Comprehensive Cancer Network) in the States indicated for extraCCA patients with resected,margin-negative ,observation or fluoropyrimidine-based chemoradiotherapy are acceptable options. for intraCCA patients,have no residual local disease,no adjuvant therapy recommendation are made.
“Is there some evidence you have seen that Gem also works better in adjuvant therapy? The reasons for the Bilcap trial using Xeloda seem to be based on it’s positive results with colon/pancreatic cancers.
I’m wondering what a study of Cap v Gem would yield. ” please go to http://www.mdpi.com/journal/cancers and put in title as Targeted therapy for biliary tract cancer.author=junji Furuse and review the article. It will provide you,on table 1 phase II studies of the most used chemo agents up to date for CCA;except 2 studies, most are very current(after 2004 to 2010) especially table 2.(all are in 2010).“Also interested in why you think Gem and Cap together might be more effective? “
It is because gemzar and 5FU(or capecitabline) are the 1st-line treatment chemo agents,by EACH itself ,proven to be effective in treating CCA. for Gemzar itself alone is arounf 7-27% and 5FU by itself is around 0-34%.And there were studies indicated when they combined together the objective response rate is 31% with an additional 42% had STABLE disease.(you can read more into it from the above studies from table1 and 2 in that article.)“Did you find something which shows radiation successful after a resection with good margins? I seem to find studies which say radiation is usually used with positive margins?”
Please see the above NCNN and ESMO recommendations that I have just included in this message. And no.I did not find anything showing radiation is necessary after resection with good margin.But as I talked to Dr, Levy from Mayo during the ASCO 2011 where he presented”Soup and Nuts about CCA” he said one thing about EUS for extrahepatic CCA was that ,”there are always residual CCA cells may involve in recurrence.” in short ,it is difficult even with great care when taking biopsy from tumors .By the same token, it is very difficult,even with good surgeon,to resect with clean margin and expected the CCA will never return for the same reason. I had >1cm in clean margin the 1st resection and still recur after 18 months. (that might mean microscopically the residual CCA cells (not the tumor) may be too small to be pick up by intraoperative ultrasound,but macroscopically ,thru the surgeons naked eyes it is clean even is 1 cm away from the tumor site.)What I am trying to say is that ,be vigilant,be watchful for your dad’s CCA, even the doctor said is all clean;monitor his CCA every 3-6 months;and deal with the outcome as soon as possible with the best treatment options at that time frame.
Kate, not that many people like to know the details about cancer,but knowledge helps in understanding the tumor biology and hopefully one day the CURE can be find earlier enough for all of the CCA patients and give the caregivers like you the ultimate joyful reward of knowing that your participation is meaningful and rewarding not only to your love ones but as well as to the society- discover the cure or pathways for better and more effective treatment plans with minimun or no toxicity.
God bless.November 10, 2011 at 12:49 pm #54318katjaMemberHi Percy,
Thanks for your very informative posting. I wonder if it makes a difference that with Richard’s wife we are talking about adjuvant therapy with negative margins. I noticed the Bilcap protocol says that Cap seems not to be as effective with advanced CCA. Is there some evidence you have seen that Gem also works better in adjuvant therapy? The reasons for the Bilcap trial using Xeloda seem to be based on it’s positive results with colon/pancreatic cancers.
I’m wondering what a study of Cap v Gem would yield. Also interested in why you think Gem and Cap together might be more effective? Did you find something which shows radiation successful after a resection with good margins? I seem to find studies which say radiation is usually used with positive margins?
Thanks again.
KateNovember 10, 2011 at 12:44 am #54317pcl1029MemberHi,Gavin and Marion,
you are always welcome.Gavin, with last nite’s win ,the Bear may actually have a chance for playoff.
If they will beat the Lions this Sunday ,then I may ask your mum to borrow 20 pounds from her and bet on the Bears to win the NFC at least;.Again the 49ers looks so good this year under Jim Habrough -a former Bear QB from the Golden era. Make sure you say hi to your mum for me.And to Marion, sometimes I feel bad that I cannot comfort those patients and caregivers like you and Lainy or Gavin did. I know as patients,some of them just don’t want to know.
and therefore sometimes I choose not to answer ALL the messages I saw on the board but selectively in fear of upsetting them more.It is a difficult choice;plus I am not good at that anyway emotionally.
God bless.November 10, 2011 at 12:15 am #54316marionsModeratorThanks Gavin and Percy.
November 9, 2011 at 7:52 pm #54315gavinModeratorHere’s a link to the Journal that you mention Percy –
http://www.nature.com/nrgastro/journal/v8/n4/full/nrgastro.2011.20.html
Thank you Percy for everything.
Gavin
November 9, 2011 at 6:13 pm #54314pcl1029MemberHi,Marion,
That was mentioned in the article written by Tushar Patel-“Cholangiocarcinoma-controversies and challenges” on Gastroenterology & Hepatology vol.8 apr.2011.
The exact quote is,”In contrast to patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma ,the combination of gemcitabine with cisplatin does not seem to offer an advantage for those with ductal cancers.”
And in uptodate.com ,when they review ‘Systemic therapy for Advanced cholangiocarcinoma”,they mentioned,base on the review of the article by Patt YZ,HassanMM etc”Oral capecitabine for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma,cholangiocarcinoma and gallbladder carcinoma.Cancer 2004;101:578″,for some unclear reasons capecitabine as a single agent appears relatively less active for cholangiocarcinoma than for gallbadder caner.But here is the tumor biology of gallbladder cancer come into place.The gallbladder lymphatics drain FIRST to the cystic and the common duct nodes first and in some cases to the lymphatic nodes posterior to the pancreas or portal vein.If so,the gallbladder cancer is more related to the ductal(extrahepatic) CCA than intrahepatic CCA(which mainly involved the liver.) and therefore I think Patel’s observation is correct.
Futhermore,and here is the difficulty for chosing the BEST chemotherapy for the specific type of cholangiocarcinoma (intra or extrahepatic) according to up to date.com and what I read so far is this.
By no means that the Gemzar/Cis is the REFERENCE standard . Ramdomized trials will be needed toCOMPARE if Gem/Cis is more active regimen and less toxic than gem/cap(Xeloda);GEMOX(oxaliplatin);CAPOX(capecitabine/oxalipiatin);Gem/irinotecan;not to mention to compare Gem/cis using one of the above regimen with one of the molecularly targeted therapy like erlotinib(Tarceva) or bevacizuman(Avastin).
The only thing that is clear is that Gem/cis in combination provides better overall response than using Gemzar alone. but than again,using Gemzar alone is not a bad choice too, it works for me for 14 months and I think after 2nd opinion,I think I will be on it again. I will present myself as an experiment and see what can come out with it to benefit to all of us. So far I know for sure one thing; that it takes exactly 12 months for an intrahepatic CCA to grow from 0 to 3cm(a size like a large grape inside the bile duct without vascular involvement.)
I will report the results and decisions made as the ride continuing thru this long and winding journey.
God bless.November 9, 2011 at 1:25 am #54313marionsModeratorPercy……did you see some studies on the extrahepatic vs. intrahepatic and response to above mentioned?
November 8, 2011 at 10:34 pm #54312richardlMemberMany thanks for the advice. We’re still waiting for the revised histology – should have it tomorrow, but suggested chemo now looks like Gem on its own. BILCAP en route.
November 8, 2011 at 9:26 pm #54311pcl1029MemberHi,Richard,
If your wife’s histology reported indicated positive margin;do what the 2nd opinion recommended;that is Gem/cis and radiation. If your wife’s CCA is extrahepatic CCA,Gem/Cap , radiation with or without FUDR or Capecitabine may be a better choice since 5FU or capecitabine for some unknown reason works better for extrahepatic CCA than intrahepatic CCA unless your wife have done some chemo sensitivity test for choosing the proper agents.and it is much easier to take the Capecitabine than the cisplatin.(less toxic to the kidney and hair loss.)
I love to see a copy of the BILCAP procotol if you can e mail me one.
God bless.November 8, 2011 at 7:51 am #54310richardlMemberKate, I’ll send the BILCAP as an attachment (and anyone else is welcome to have a copy); as far as I can see it’s not on the web.
2nd opinion recommendation for my wife was immediate GemCIS followed by radiotherapy, but our 2nd opinion hospital onco requested repeat exam. of the histology/slides and have (radically) revised the original histo report, so this advice may change. It just happened yesterday. Ist opinion was choice of either BILCAP or active surveillance (expectant management?).
November 8, 2011 at 3:33 am #54309katjaMemberThanks Richard, it’s been nearly two years since I did my research but I think I had read most of those-I can still see why our oncologist said’what would we radiate?’. Margin status seems to play a more significant role in RT .
I had not found a Bilcap protocol of 75 pages though-would be very interestedto read that.
What chemo/radiation has your wife been offered?
KateNovember 8, 2011 at 12:09 am #54308richardlMemberPCL 1029, you’re absolutely correct about the 2-year figures.
Kate, I think you’ll find this interesting: http://goo.gl/xE8lg
If you tweak it to give Bile Duct / Resectable Disease, there’s some useful info on survival rates for 5 years, and there are enough references to keep me quiet for a day or so – I’m still wading through them.
Also, have you got the full BILCAP protocol? It’s about 75 pages, and I’ve got it on PDF if you haven’t.
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘General Discussion’ is closed to new topics and replies.