Adjuvant use of Keytruda?????
Discussion Board › Forums › General Discussion › Adjuvant use of Keytruda?????
- This topic has 13 replies, 7 voices, and was last updated 8 years, 4 months ago by marions.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 6, 2016 at 9:18 pm #92866marionsModerator
Julie…I have learned that there are several ways of collecting, processing and storing of tumor tissue, hence it’s possible for it to be contaminated or “old”.
Are things out of control? It sure appears that way, but I believe that things will come together with the two additional tumor testing results and the suggestions of the physicians involved.Please check your e-mail for my letter.
Hang in there,
Hugs,
MarionAugust 6, 2016 at 6:52 am #92865debnorcalModeratorJulie, I feel for you. This is so difficult. Hopefully, it’s morning when you read this and you’ll have had a restful sleep. I hope you can take a deep breath and prepare to fight on. It really sounds to me that you are the expert in this situation. Your current oncologist is not explaining his thought process to you clearly, nor does he seem willing to have the consult with Dr. Javie. I think you are correct in thinking you should change oncologists. I wouldn’t worry about offending current onc. Especially with rare cancers, it is very common to seek second opinions. I would simply tell the current oncologist you would like a referral (if required) to the doctor of your choice for another opinion. Depending on how that goes, you might ask the second oncologist to consult with Dr. javie. Many cc specialty centers have a multidisciplinary team consisting of surgeon, oncologist, radiologist, etc. that meet to discuss cases. It might be helpful for your doctors to get together to discuss from all perspectives.
I hope this is helpful. Stay strong, Julie. You can do this.
Debbie
August 5, 2016 at 5:22 pm #92864iowagirlMemberHELP AGAIN:
I just got a phone call from the oncologist ….one of the three mutation tests (HERS2) was negative and they were waiting on the results of the other two year. He thought it was maybe because the tumor sample was “so old” (that would be 8 months) it was making it more difficult. I’m at a total loss.Meanwhile, I decided that I needed to bring up the topic of them wanting to do chemo before even thinking about removing the tumor in the right lobe.
Despite the opinion of the surgeon that the area in question along the resection line is probably not a recurrent malignancy, it seems apparent that the oncologist IS concerned about it. Further more, he thinks that if we ablate the known maglignancy in the right lobe and say 5 or so show up at my next 3 month scan, then they would have put me through the ablation procedure for NOTHING and further more it would have shown that they SHOULD have done chemo. When I asked WHY h e said the ablation would have been for nothing, because my surgeon indicated that we would just keep mopping these up as long as it was possible or they didn’t how up again….as long as say 20 didn’t appear all at once. Apparently, if any show up a gain, the oncologist’s take on it is that there’s nothing more to do EXCEPT chemo….that you don’t just keep zapping or doing small wedge resections. And…of course, he brought up the idea of IF they showed up elsewhere….like the lungs….or bones….. I don’t think he would do anything for that EXCEPT more chemo.
I had some long lasting , never gone away, side effects damage f rom doing the gem/cis and I expressed to the oncologist my fear that if I do this chemo now instead of a re gional procedure, then I may have more lasting damage that may make me ineligible for any clinical trials in the future , when that may be my only option.
I just didn’t feel like I got anywhere in discussing this with him.
He finally said something about talking again to my surgeon and the other senior oncologist with whom he consulted b efore (that would be his supervisor) to discuss this all again. So, I mentioned that I’d like him to do a dr. to dr. consult with Dr. Javle at MD Anderson ….which has to be initiated by my current oncologist and also with Dr. Alberts there at Mayo. Alberts is an expert Doc in CC. The onc’s response was that he’d send out some emails today to get a conservation going about this again with “the p eople who know me” and maybe talk to “outside people” later. In other words, he isn’t going to initiate any consult with Javle. Javle’s office said a consult HAD to be ph ysican to physician….that they wouldn’t set up an appt for me to go there to talk with Javle in person.
The surgeon…. on Tuesday….gave us the indication that if we did the two months of FOLFOX chemo first as the oncologists want to do, then right after that…he would do the ablation of the right lobe tumor and if there were more that showed up, he’d deal with those as well. But, in a nutshell, the oncologist doesn’t appear to have any thought of any intervention by the surgeon or Interventional r adiology if any more tumors appear. Oh….and on top of all of that….today, the oncologist mentioned three months of FOLFOX….instead of the two months that he previously said.
I don’t know what to do next…..o ther than maybe call the surgeon again to talk with him over the phone. I think I have the wrong oncologist……but am I missing something.? Isn’t it better to remove the tumor by whatever method available when it IS removable, instead of waiting to “see” ….and if more show up….. isn’t the idea to do the same with them?
The supervising oncologist is a well -known oncologist/professor at Mayo…but I don’t know if that means anything in this case.
I am considering a change in oncologists…..at least up there at Mayo, but I will wait a little while longer to hear the results of this exchange of ideas among my surgeon and the two oncologists. But, if I do not hear anything that convinces me that the oncology route is the best ide a for treatment for me…..I have no idea how to go about changing oncologits u p there.. My first oncologit at Mayo ….did mention thtat if I was ever uncomfortable with him (e sp since he was on fellowship), that I could switch oncologists….but th at never was a problem…… the route of treatment was always clear to him and me .
I f eel that I’m right back where I started and like the consult with the surgeon never happened. Tears again, dang it. Feels like everything is out of control.
Julie
August 4, 2016 at 5:47 am #92863iowagirlMemberThanks for the info, Marion. I thought that was how it was for the scans, but you know how it is….after a while, all this stuff can tend to blur together and y ou can suddenly be uncer tain about everything. Chemo brain doesn’t help either.
The surgeon won’t committ 100% to the idea that the left lobe issue is scar tissue /healing from the surgery, but he was pretty confident and did not see a need right now to rush in to look at it or remove it.
As for the s cans…..he said that one of the best radiologists had read it….someone with a lot of experience from what I gathered. I’m sure that in the process of reading these things, there can be plenty of disagreement over what something is or means. We’ve looked at the MRI of my liver numerous times over the past two+ years and I still can’t see how they find anything. When they point it out, I can see it at least.
We started to use the MRI of my pelvis/abdomen when I had some potentially allergic reactions to the CT contrast. So , we only use the CT without contrast for my lungs. The rest is done with MRI of my abdomen and pelvis. My original oncologist at Mayo was very happ y to have the MRI scan for a better picture of the pelvis. The MRI does take quite a bit longer time…..about an hour….and a lot of breath holding during that time…and being completely still…no moving. ANd….you have to be mostly into the narrow tube that bothers some people. I was okay with it……but since the pictures of are of my pelvis….my head isn’t THAT far from the end fo the tube . It’s managable. The other good thing is that it also does limit the radiation exposure that the CT gives off. I like that aspect. Howev er, this comes at a price….as the MRI is more costly.
On that note….I just had to change insurance to a Me dicare plan on July 1 (timing sucked) because I had been on disabiity for two years. Since I have CC and am on disability, all I can get is one of the “Advantage” plans. I got one of the best ones i could fine, but now I have NO idea when it’s going to pay…and finding doctors in network is difficult, even with their book for reference. Next April, when I turn 65, I will then be able to switch to a regular Medicare policy with a supplement . But this year will be kind of crappy ….because I lost my old policy Ju ly 1, af tere having almost met the out of pocket for the year, only to now have to start over on the out of pocket for the 2nd half of the year. Then, I will do that again as of Jan 1 …..and then in April when I am 65, I will switch to a supplementa l policy with medicare. Dep ending on what all I do for treatment…. I will probably have to hit the out of pocket three times within less than 18 months before they start paying fully for things. That’s going to bite.
Th anks again, Marion. You are a wealth of information.
Tomorrow is another day……r ejoice and be glad in it.
Julie t.
August 4, 2016 at 4:17 am #92862marionsModeratorJulie…..I am with you all the way, mop it up and this cancer is gone, forever. We have seen it and we will continue to witness it.
In regards to the MRI, you are correct, plate thickness is related to CT scans. MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) I have learned that in many tissues, the image and detail are clearer with an MRI than a CT scan. For some tissues, MRI image is less clear than CT and it is difficult to distinguish between Inflammation and scar tissue. Ultimately, it is the experience of the operator that counts. That’s all I know, but others may have more to share with us.In any case, dear Julie, I am glad that more light was shed on your situation and that you have a great team of physicians on your side.
Awaiting the molecular testing results along with you.
Hugs,
MarionAugust 4, 2016 at 12:11 am #92861iowagirlMemberMarion,
Yes, in my case, it could be a chronic illness, but if he is accurate in that we are in a mopping up situation, there could be a time when no more tumors show up. We’ll probably never be free of the anxiety and fear of another recurrance, even is a lot of time elapses. But, I am now looking forward to a time when perhaps no more will show up.
Question: It was my understanding that the plate thickness of 1 cm referred to the CT scan, but that the MRI is more sensitive and can detect the tumors as small as 5 mm . Is that right? I do have a CT scan without contrast but only of my lungs. I get an MRI with contrast of my abdomen and pelvis. It was in that MRI from April that the surgeon saw the 8 mm tumor which is now 11 mm (1.1 cm). I want to make sure I un derstand this right.
I didn’t think about the surgeon being the one with the most accurate knowledge of my liver, but that makes total sense. I’m soooo glad I had that consult with my GP and she advised me to do the face to face consult instead of having the oncologist discuss it with him. I LOVE my G P….she is a very special woman and doctor. At the end of our consult….. she knew there was really nothing medically she could do for me, and then asked me if she could pray with me. That is the s econd time she has done this during the course of this disease.
No phone call from the oncologist about the results of the mutation lab tests YET. This is frustrating to have it drag out so much longer than they originally said it would be.
Julie
August 3, 2016 at 9:07 pm #92860marionsModeratorJulie….you feel better and we feel better as well. I trust your GP in that the first individual to revisit (post assumed recurrence) is the surgeon. He/she has the most accurate knowledge of your liver and the surgical intervention. Due to plate thickness, scans don’t detect nodules less than 1cm in size, hence results are based on the interpretation of the radiologist.
I strongly believe that this cancer should be viewed as a chronic disease for which treatment options have become increasingly more available.
Hugs to you,
MarionAugust 3, 2016 at 8:33 pm #92859iowagirlMemberI want to thank those who responded to my plea for help and encouragement Monday night.. I was having one of “those” anxiety moments, which hits me at times when things are just too uncertain with which for me to deal .
UPDATE:
The face to face meeting with the surgeon was the best thing I could have done. I’m so glad I consulted with my GP and she gave me that advice. Sometimes, we forget about going back to step one and involving the doctor who knows us best (or should know us anyway). I have a 40+ year relationship with my GP…. and she knows me very well. She was the one who found my tumor originally.
The Consult: The surgeon was again, a really nice guy and a background…. he also does research into CC, so he is, himself, very knowledgable about CC . He talked a little first and listened to a few of my questions and concerns. Then, he looked at the MRIs from my July scans and also the scans from April.
First, the suspicious area in the left lobe for being malignant : He said he did not believe that was a malignancy. He believes that it is for lack of better words, an inflamed (my word choice) due to the surgery he did on it there in Dec of 2015. He also said that he uses some kind of material to pack against the cut edge of the liver at the end of surgery to help stop the bleeding or to keep it from bleeding. The body eventually absorbs this over a long period of time and creates a sort of “bloob” (his and my word) in that area. He went to the April scan and compared the same frame side by side and in the July scan, the area had actually gotten slightly smaller. In regard to the lymph node that was slightly enlarged…it was the same size as it was in April in the scan…..and the surgeon indicated that these are frequently seen along side the liver after surgery….and indication of the liver having been operated on…. thus the ly mph node was more “inflammatory” in nature…not malignant. I had enlarged lymph nodes before the first surgery ….they were removed and all negative, so I do “buy” this explanation.
Next: The growth in the right lobe has classic signs of a malignancy, which I already knew from research. The visual of it is a classic round h alo, donut or target look. It HAS to be dealt with. Initially, he indicated that this was very manageable by ablating it …as it was in a perfect place for getting all of it. He then looked at the MRIs…comparing both…on a hunch…..and the tumor WAS visible in April after all.. The radiologist had missed it on the MRI when he viewed it for comments. In fairness, the tumor was at the April scan, only 8 mm , so very, very difficult to see…and at this point, we are looking for it, knowing exactly where to look . The good news is…that by seeing it on the April scan…. and knowing its size then….and comparing it to the size in July, which was 1.1 cm (or 11 mm), he said this is indicative of a V ERY slow growing cancer. He said he still believes as before, that this tumor and the tumor wh ich appeared in Nov of 2015 were cells that were there in my liver at the time of the first sur gery in FEb 2014 . The fact that the cell crossed over into the right lobe could be that a cell entered the blood stream from the left lobe tumor and circulated throu gh my body and eventually lodged in that right lobe where it has taken all this time to g row large enough to show up. That’s a guess anyway.
So, if he is right, then he sees this whole situation with a single tumor popping up here and there as a “mopping” up after the main surgery. The fact that the cells have taken this long to grow from the initial surgery again would indicate a very slow growing cancer. (Note that CC t ends to be must faster and more aggressive ….it i possible that the adjuvant chemo beat these cells back for a while before they started growing again.. There could have been other cells that were actually killed by the chemo leaving these stragglers for us to mop up. We will never know. For now, the situation isn’t as “dire” as we thought it was when listening to the oncologist.
The Plan: The surgeon called the oncologist and discussed the situation…told him that he did not believe the left area was a malignancy and reasons. Then, he discussed the ablation of the right tumor. The oncologist apparently presented his case for doing FOLFOX chemo first…..as long as there was the tumor there,…they could use it a a marker to see if the chemo would reduce the size and if so, they would know if it was worth trying it again if need be ( I guess this would be if multiple tumors suddenly appeared). Since the surgeon thinks this is very slow growing compared to most CC, he said there is no problem doing the chemo for the two months suggested and then at the end of that time, he would ablate the tumor and if another popped up, he would do that at the same time.
The final wrinkle in all of this is that the 3 mutation studies are STILL not done so no answers. They were “hoping” that it showed an MSI (microsatellite instability) mutation, which happens in about 15-20% of CC patients. In that case , they may want to throw Keytruda into my treatment using it “off label” . It was indicated to us that if I had the MSI mutation, that it would very likely be approved for compassionate use. That presents a financial concern because of the huge cost, but as Matt indicated there are others who have received Keytruda from Merck pharmaceuticals for free. The other option is to try to get into a clinical trial they have for MSI if I have the mutation and qualify for the trial. This is an area that yet needs to be discussed, because, at first the oncologist indicated that if I tested positive for MSI, then they ‘d try to get me into the trial…and if I’m not positive for that (or a couple other mutations), then they’d start FOLFOX. Now, it sounds like they would do F OLFOX first anyway….. so there are things to discuss before anything gets started.
Thank you again to those who responded and threw out life lines. I was in a very “bad” place emotionally that night and couldn’t deal with anything…there was just too much uncertainty. Today, after speaking with the surgeon yesterday, I feel more in control again. He ha a way of dealing with things that is very comforting as well as knowledgable. He exudes quiet confidence. He is the opposite of most surgeons I’ve met…..not boistrous or full of himself. When he enters the room…..he’s quiet, but pleasant…not drawing attention to himself and his team follows suit. When he talks with you, he’s soft spoken but confident…and never appears to have his hand on the door knob, ready to bolt the room at the first opportunity. He gave us numerous occasion to ask more questions….during which there were long silences when he could have just cut it off and left, but he didn’t. His own team refers to his surgical skills as “meticulous”.
Oh…. his name is Dr. Rory Smoot…and I would absolutely recommend him.
I’ll report back when I hear the results of the mutation tests.
Julie T.
August 3, 2016 at 8:36 am #92858middlesister1ModeratorDear Julie,
Thinking of you and hoping all goes well at your visit. I’m sorry you have to deal with this rather than just enjoying life.
Love and hugs,,
CatherineAugust 3, 2016 at 2:25 am #92857mlidoudouSpectatorDear Julie:
My mother is using Keytruda in an adjuvant setting in Hong Kong after she had surgery for a recurrence 5 years post initial diagnosis. After diagnosis of her recurrence in Dec 2015, we were also given the option of first doing chemo to shrink the tumors before surgery. After doing some research in the literature, I realize it may not be a good option, fearing that chemo may not work to shrink tumors and we may miss an opportunity to surgically remove the tumor. After the surgery, my mom is given the option to do adjuvant therapy, using either Xeloda with and without radiation, or Gem/Cis. My mom is in her seventies and may not tolerate these treatment well. So we searched all over town to get second opinions on adjuvant therapy. Finally, we found one oncologist in Queen Mary Hospital in Hong Kong and consulted him in private setting. We were happy to hear that Keytruda can be given in an adjuvant setting but of course there is no data yet showing whether it would be useful. But considering the lower toxicity of Keytruda and the fact that chemo also only has a response rate of 20-30% in CC, we opted for Keytruda, but have to pay for the drug from our own pocket. My mom so far had 5 injections of Keytruda and did have some side effects. After the 3rd injection, she started having mouth sores and after the 5th injection, she had symptoms of hypothyroid (constipation, fatigue, feeling cold, blurred vision, mood changes etc) although her TSH levels are normal. Also, her serum creatinine levels seem to be elevated after the 4th and 5th injection. It is also not known how many injections she should do as there is no indicators of cancer in her case after surgery. So it is possible to use Keytruda for adjuvant therapy but data is lacking at this stage. I am also hoping that my mom is MSI but we did not test for it. She does have NF1 mutation which may be an indicator of MSI so I believe Keytruda would be useful for her.
Wish you all the best in your decision making,
Maggie
August 2, 2016 at 2:45 pm #92856mlaytonSpectatorJulie,
I am so sorry to hear about your latest recurrence. I admire your fighting attitude. I have a little bit of knowledge that I can impart, as I have spoken to several experts about Keytruda trials for my wife Lisa. As you know, Keytruda has shown tremendous promise for the treatment of hematologic malignancies as well as solid tumors such as cholangiocarcinoma. For cholangiocarcinoma, it seems that only a small percentage of patients have a robust response, but it is way too early to draw any conclusions. Researchers are still uncertain as to which populations of patients will have a response. The PD-L1 antibody was previously considered a possible indicator that a particular patient could have a response to Keytruda (or similar class of immunotherapy agents). I have been told that PD-L1 is losing favor as a predictive biomarker; however, a positive PD-L1 result can still qualify some patients for participation in certain Keytruda trials. It seems that other biomarkers such as microsatellite instability (MSI), mutation burden, or the presence of specific mutations such as BRAF may be better indicators of response to treatment, but again, the research is evolving so quickly that this information may already be dated.I am not aware of Keytruda being used in an adjuvant setting. The clinical trials that I have explored all require measurable disease in order to qualify. However, your oncologist could always prescribe Keytruda off label outside of a trial. The disadvantage of off-label use is that you could be ineligible for future immunotherapy trials. Also, off-label use is not typically covered by insurance, although Merck has provided the drug at no cost to many patients who go this route.
Regarding FOLFOX, I know of many cholangiocarcinoma patients that have done very well on this combination. My wife Lisa had a very good response to folfirinox (similar to folfox with irinotecan added) after failing on the standard gem-cis. In fact, her robust response is the only reason that she was able to have a life-saving resection surgery. Folfirnox did not completely eliminate the tumors, but shrank them enough to make her eligible for surgery.
I agree with you that it would make sense to have surgery immediately if you are eligible rather than wait to see how you respond to chemotherapy. I am sorry I cannot help with this question. I would definitely clarify the reasons with your medical team and possibly seek a second opinion. Clearly all cases are different, but I know that some patients on this board have had more than two resections for multiple recurrences.
Wishing you the best at your appointments today. Please keep us posted.
-Matt
August 2, 2016 at 5:02 am #92855iowagirlMemberLainy….I didn’t think about the alcohol cure for my anxiety …….perhaps that is what I need. ….maybe a nice White Russian perhaps. But, I don’t get silly on booze….I just fall asleep….so you’d be there being silly and I’d be snoring in the corner.
I do have some Lorazipam leftover from when I was doing chemo. I may get it out and take some ….but I don’t want anything causing me to be fuzzy thinking when I’m talking to the surgeon either.
I wish I could talk with Dr. Javle….but when I called for an appt with him…and they found out it was for a consult, they said that he only does those Dr. to Dr…..and that I would not go down to Houston to see him in person. (We were ready to go ). It just didn’t sound right… …I swear that I’ve read about other people going down there to get his advice. Right now, I”m shaking my head….I don’t know what to think about any of this. Maybe I’ll get myself pulled together tomorrow.??????
Julie
August 2, 2016 at 4:51 am #92854lainySpectatorJulie, time for Dr. Javle? I just emailed you but have a suggestion. Can you take a little something to help the nerves. If I was there we could really tie one on. Oops, I just smell alcohol and I am 3 sheets to the wind….but it could be fun! I know you would laugh at me hysterically. Anyway I am with you in spirit!
August 2, 2016 at 4:38 am #12665iowagirlMemberTomorrow, I go to have a face to face consult with my surgeon from last December to see what his thoughts are concerning a possible resection for my second recurrence of intrahepatic CC.
I am waiting (somewhat impatiently) for the results of three mutation tests being run this past week at Mayo. ONe is for MSI (microsatellite instability), which has about a 15-20% occurence rate I think. IF that is positive, I would be eligible for that clinical trial and get Keytruda.
Keytrude , while it has done fantastic things for some patients, it h asn’t for many others.
So, while I know I”m putting the cart before the horse, I’m trying to weigh all the “what ifs” in advance to get some handle on my choices of treatment. The good word in that statement is “choices”, but some of my choices leave a big question mark for me and others are not acceptable for various reasons.
The oncology d ept is pushing for a clinical trial, but I want to make sure that another surgery is not my best route. H owever, after a surgery, I would probably have to do some kind of adjuvant therapy….. and if I did come back positive for the MSI mutation, it makes sense to me that the drug Keytruda be used instead of some chemo. I can’t do the Gem -Cis any longer…because the 6 rounds I did, after the first resection, damaged my kidney’s. I just barely make the cut off for clinical trials now. as it is. But, I have no idea if Keytrude has ever been used in an adjuvant setting….post resection.
IF I do not match one of the three mutation being studied, the oncology dept then suggests I do FOLFOX chemo for two months…and wait to see at that time if any more tumors appear. THEN….they said that maybe they would consider looking at another resection. Their reason for waiting was so that I would not go through another surgery just to have it come back. That makes no sense to me. The tumors are small yet…..so why not go after them and be aggressive? And…if the tumors grow while on FOLFOX……then they may become either too big for ablation (the one side probably would be ablated) and the other tumor might have grown through the liver outer wall. Waiting to see what happens just sounds like they are throwing up their hands and giving up….and I am not ready to give up.
Anybody out there with any thoughts on this? Experiences with FOLFOX doing anything making it worth getting a hepatic pump put in and another chemo port.? I find it interesting that they’d put me through the chemo, hepatic pump and port surgeries, but not a resection. The Folfox would not get rid of the tumors if I understand right. ????? Help……I’m in tears over this…… I know I should sit back and wait until I have more information to go on….but it’s driving me crazy. I have always had my ducks in a row and this has me feeling totally out of control and helpless suddenly.
Julie T.
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘General Discussion’ is closed to new topics and replies.