Post-Whipple follow-up scans and tests?
Discussion Board › Forums › General Discussion › Post-Whipple follow-up scans and tests?
- This topic has 17 replies, 6 voices, and was last updated 12 years, 2 months ago by richardl.
-
AuthorPosts
-
September 6, 2012 at 10:31 pm #62592richardlMember
Many thanks – those links are useful.
September 6, 2012 at 2:35 am #62591pcl1029MemberHi,
may be this will help.http://www.cholangiocarcinoma.org/punbb/viewtopic.php?id=2080
there are also some discussion under the experience forum of Radiation treatments options on earlier posts.
God bless
September 5, 2012 at 10:22 pm #62590richardlMemberThe information is much appreciated, but I still can’t see what RFA is – there’s no mention on the link you posted. I’m sure I’m missing the obvious but perhaps you could steer us in the right direction?
September 5, 2012 at 3:05 pm #62589pcl1029MemberHi,
Please see attachment for RFA.http://www.veithsymposium.org/pdf/aim/3068.pdf
CA19-9 is mor reliable on cancer especially in prognostic use of colon and rectal cancer. Pancreatic cancer too. However CA19-9 may be of less valuable and of less predictable value in INTRA rather than extra hepatic CCA. But the TREND as far as I know (ie: 14;14.5;17;21 ;24 etc on an monthly basis is not as good as (ie: 21;19,16.5,14,13 etc), That is for intra hepatic CCA. Extra CCA may be very different especially if stents are involved. Normally CA19-9> 129 is indicative of CCA involvement in cholangiocarcinoma.
The units used are the same for CA19-9. For pancreatic ca, it can go as high as >100000 U / ml. For extra hepatic CCA, the highest I have seen on this message was 97,000.
See also attachment about CA19-9 .
http://www.veithsymposium.org/pdf/aim/3068.pdfGod bless.
September 5, 2012 at 11:12 am #62588richardlMemberMany thanks for the information.
May I ask what RFA stands for?
It’s interesting to hear (from another Forum member) that some oncologists are not interested in following C19-9 at all, and consider it unreliable.
I’m also interested in the units we are using. When we talk about C19-9 readings in the 0-37 range, are we using the same units as those who report in 100’s or 1,000’s?
September 4, 2012 at 5:18 pm #62587pcl1029MemberHi,
I sincerely don’t know all the answers.
I took Gemzar for 18 month.( bio marker test indicated Gemzar will work in my case); but the cancer returned after 24 month.resection again to remove the 3×2 cm new tumor in a difficult location..RFA to remove the one that was< 3cm in size.chemoembrolization to provide finish touch of the one by RFA.
I never had CA19-9> 37, but I had intrahepatic CCA which is different than extra hepatic CCA that Whipple procedure is one of the procedure that is used .
I never had CEA> 3.5. In fact it was within normal when I had removed the 8×5.6 cm tumor at the first surgery.
Inflammation, infection, acid reflux,GI related issue like colon and rectal problems and stress will all affect the value of both biomarker’s result.
Unless it develop a trend of upward or downward movement in several months. I don’t think it is all that important. However a sudden big jump( ie: from tens to hundreds or thousands in a month) or dive is of value to look deeper at them.
I had no experiences on other issues you mentioned.
God bless.September 4, 2012 at 10:23 am #62586richardlMemberMy wife had an incisional hernia repair (with mesh) at the beginning of July, and has made a good recovery.
We’re trying to educate ourselves on the follow-up bloodwork results, with particular reference to CEA and C19-9. We’ve found quite a bit of information, but if anyone knows of particularly instructive websites, we’d appreciate the links.
We’re not sure what a ‘normal’ range actually implies (0-37 on C19-9?), and the plus/minus errors on these readings. We understand that individual readings don’t give as much information as a trend.
Also it would be really useful to know whether C19-9, in particular, could be affected (in the short term) by a hernia repair and/or fairly heavy Creon dosage.
Any comments on the following treatment history would be really appreciated:
Whipple 4sep11
Post-adjuvant Gemzar chemo ran 6 months from Nov11 – April12
Incisional hernia repair 4jul12CEA from 26oct11 though to last week has been steady at 3 or 4.
CA19-9 reduced from 13 (26oct11) down to 6 (+/- 2) (15may12), but last week blipped up to 25 (previous reading was 5 on 15may12). She had repeat bloodwork yesterday, but the results are not back yet.
We have total confidence in her consultant (Marsden UK), but we’re keen to learn from anyone else in the same situation.
Many thanks.
July 1, 2012 at 5:33 pm #62585lainySpectatorExcellent post, Eli. Teddy was also told not to lift anything. BTW most of his golf ball size hernias popped up about 3 years after the Whipple along the scar line. He never had pain or discomfort with them.
July 1, 2012 at 4:04 pm #62576EliSpectatorHi Richard,
After my wife’s Whipple, the surgeons told her not to lift anything heavier than 10 lbs. She diligently followed the instructions but she developed hernia anyway. My understanding is, hernias are very common after Whipple.
My wife’s hernia is huge. She looks like she is a few months pregnant. She wears abdominal binder to support it. It’s very uncomfortable to say the least. The good news is, it doesn’t cause any pain.
Hernia repair surgery is a relatively simple surgery. Nothing compared to Whipple. The risks come afterwards. To repair hernia, they put a synthetic surgical mesh behind the abdominal muscle wall. This surgical mesh does NOT dissolve. It stays there permanently and may cause a number of potential problems.
In some patients, it causes chronic pain. I don’t know what percentage of patients. I told my wife that, no matter how small the risk is, she should not take it. Uncomfortable hernia is tolerable; chronic pain and painkillers are not acceptable.
Another issue is, it’s not uncommon for hernias to come back. If and when they come back, they can be a big mess. Much bigger mess than the original hernia. The body forms scar tissue around the surgical mesh. If hernia comes back, the surgeon can’t simply take out the old mesh and put a new one. They have to deal with scars.
One more concern… surgical mesh is a foreign object in the body. Immune system reacts to it. I remember a post from a forum member who had enlarged lymph nodes after her hernia repair. The catch is, the enlarged lymph nodes can also be a sign of the cancer coming back. Her doctors couldn’t figure out what it was by looking at the scans. She had to do a biopsy of the nodes to figure it out. I told my wife she doesn’t need this extra stress.
Given all these risks, we decided to wait and see. If the hernia stays pain-free, there is no rush to do anything.
Please note, I’m not a doctor. This is not an expert opinion. I might be blowing these issues out of proportion. You have to discuss the risks with your wife’s doctors.
Good luck making the right decision!
July 1, 2012 at 2:21 pm #62579richardlMemberMany thanks – just what we needed!
July 1, 2012 at 2:09 pm #62578pcl1029MemberHi,
There are information on Our web site That are related to the Ct, MRI and PET and the link is below.
http://www.cholangiocarcinoma.org/punbb/viewtopic.php?id=6543
http://www.cholangiocarcinoma.org/punbb/viewtopic.php?pid=61437#
God bless.
July 1, 2012 at 1:40 pm #62577richardlMemberMany thanks, everyone, for the feedback.
We really need to get clear in our own minds the difference in use of CT, PET and MRI; when they’re used, and exactly what for.
We’re seeing her surgeon tomorrow, so hope to get that explained, and also to find out the options for the hernia repair. One thing appears certain, and that’s hernias don’t heal themselves.
After my wife’s Whipple they didn’t advise any restrictions on movement or exercise – just return to a normal life as soon as you can was the attitude. She remembers the exact occasion, lifting a box, that almost certainly initiated the hernia and its development.
June 29, 2012 at 7:56 pm #62584lainySpectatorHi Richard, My husband had clean margins after a Whipple and they set up PETS every 6 months for 5 years. He visited the ONC every 3 months with LABS as well.
Eli just want to add that Teddy had a small ventrical hernia and they would NOT do surgery. They said between the aborted Whipple and the real deal they would not do more surgery on him.June 29, 2012 at 6:08 pm #62583marionsModeratoreli…I am sorry to hear of the hernia, but have learned that with these type of surgeries it happens more often than not. Most people prolong hernia repair until things become too bothersome.
Hugs,
MarionJune 29, 2012 at 4:52 pm #62582EliSpectatorMy wife is one year post-Whipple and she is on a 3 months schedule for everything: CT scan, blood work, oncologist. She is a high risk to relapse due to microscopically positive margins and two positive lymph nodes, so we are sticking to the 3 month schedule for now.
She has a huge incisional hernia too. It doesn’t cause any pain, so we are taking wait and see approach. Hernia repair surgery is not without risks.
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘General Discussion’ is closed to new topics and replies.