Search Results for 'gemcitabine cisplatin'

Discussion Board Forums Search Search Results for 'gemcitabine cisplatin'

Viewing 15 results - 166 through 180 (of 676 total)
  • Author
    Search Results
  • #94997
    bglass
    Moderator

    Dear Tia,

    I agree with you that capecitabine seems a little overlooked. The BILCAP study results will likely change this.

    I took capecitabine as part of an adjuvant therapy after a liver resection. At the time one of my doctors asked the question “why not gem-cis rather than gem-cap?” since gem-cis is considered the standard of care as a first-line chemotherapy. But the study behind the protocol I was given pre-dated the big gem-cis trial, and included capecitabine not cisplatin, administered with gemcitabine.

    At the time I tried to read what I could find, which was a few small-sample studies. What struck me (this is a completely non-expert patient observation) was that the regimes that included capecitabine often had overall survival rates slightly longer than other chemo combinations. (As a patient, I tend to read past other end-point measures to look for overall survival.) By slightly longer, I mean by a month or two. Also capecitabine is in pill form, which is easier than a cisplatin transfusion. The adverse effects seemed less scary to me with capecitabine when compared to the platinums, although I had pretty bad hand-foot syndrome by the end (my experience, not everyone experiences this.). So I was fine with having gem-cap rather than gem-cis.

    I do not believe there have been any randomized studies yet directly comparing gem-cis with a capecitabine combination. The famous gem-cis study (also from U.K.) compared that combination to gem alone. Great Britain seems to me to have an advantage for medical research in that its care system is centralized. So for years apparently, CCA patients there who had liver resection surgery, if appropriate candidates, were encouraged to consider participation in BILCAP. This helped the study to recruit relatively large numbers of patients with this rare disease, and to produce results with statistical weight.

    I have been reading this board for nearly two years now and do not recall seeing many or any U.S. patients reporting having BILCAP-type adjuvant treatment, namely eight cycles of capecitabine.

    Regards, Mary

    gavin
    Moderator

    A phase II trial of gemcitabine (G), cisplatin (C), and nab-paclitaxel (N) in advanced biliary tract cancers (aBTCs).

    http://abstracts.asco.org/199/AbstView_199_187337.html

    gavin
    Moderator

    A phase I study of DKN-01 (D), an anti-DKK1 monoclonal antibody, in combination with gemcitabine (G) and cisplatin (C) in patients (pts) for first-line therapy with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC).

    http://abstracts.asco.org/199/AbstView_199_182654.html

    Please note that information regarding clinical trials is being provided for informational purposes only. The Cholangiocarcinoma Foundation does not endorse any specific clinical trial. Please discuss any questions you may have about clinical trials with your healthcare provider.

    gavin
    Moderator

    Apatinib as Second Line Therapy in Patients With Advanced Refractory Biliary Tract Cancers

    https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03144856

    Please note that information regarding clinical trials is being provided for informational purposes only. The Cholangiocarcinoma Foundation does not endorse any specific clinical trial. Please discuss any questions you may have about clinical trials with your healthcare provider.

    Purpose
    This study is designed to see whether Apatinib is effective in treating patients with advanced refractory biliary tract cancers.

    Condition Intervention Phase
    Biliary Tract Cancer
    Drug: Apatinib
    Phase 2

    Study Type: Interventional
    Study Design: Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment
    Intervention Model Description:
    Apatinib single agent
    Masking: No masking
    Primary Purpose: Treatment
    Official Title: Phase II Study of Apatinib as Second Line Therapy in Patients With Advanced Refractory Biliary Tract Cancer

    Resource links provided by NLM:

    MedlinePlus related topics: Cancer
    Genetic and Rare Diseases Information Center resources: Biliary Tract Cancer
    U.S. FDA Resources

    Further study details as provided by Sun Yat-sen University:

    Primary Outcome Measures:
    Progression-free survival (PFS) [ Time Frame: Approximately 1 year ]
    the time from randomize to progression or death; RECIST guidelines were used to define all responses after patients had received every 4 weeks of therapy

    Secondary Outcome Measures:
    Overall survival (OS) [ Time Frame: Approximately 2 years ]
    Defined as the time from randomize to death

    Disease control rate(DCR) [ Time Frame: Approximately 1 year ]
    Defined as the rate of complete response , partial response and stable disease according to RECIST guidelines

    Quality of life(QoL) [ Time Frame: Approximately 1 year ]
    As measured by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer questionnaire (EORTC QLQ C30)

    Safety (incidence of adverse events) [ Time Frame: Approximately 1 year ]
    Incidence of adverse events

    Estimated Enrollment: 39
    Actual Study Start Date: February 22, 2017
    Estimated Study Completion Date: March 1, 2019
    Estimated Primary Completion Date: March 1, 2019 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
    Arms Assigned Interventions
    Experimental: Apatinib group
    Apatinib 500mg, po, QD, every 4 weeks.
    Drug: Apatinib
    Apatinib 500mg, po, qd, every 4 weeks.

    Detailed Description:
    Biliary tract cancers (BTC) includes cholangiocarcinoma and gallbladder carcinoma (GBC). The systematic treatment based on gemcitabine plus cisplatin is recommended as the current standard chemotherapy for unresectable or metastatic BTC. There is no standard recommendation for second line therapy.

    Apatinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2(VEGFR-2).

    This study was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of Apatinib in patients with advanced refractory BTC who had received first-line chemotherapy.

    Eligibility

    Ages Eligible for Study: 18 Years to 75 Years (Adult, Senior)
    Sexes Eligible for Study: All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
    Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria:

    Must have histologically or cytologically documented carcinoma primary to the intra- or extra-hepatic biliary system or gall bladder with clinical and/or radiologic evidence of unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic disease.
    Patients with ampullary carcinoma are not eligible.
    Must have failed or are intolerant to one line of systemic treatment but no more than 2 prior lines of systemic chemotherapy for advanced BTC. Patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy and had evidence of disease recurrence within 6 months of completion of the adjuvant treatment are also eligible. If the patient received adjuvant treatment and had disease recurrence after 6 months, patients will only be eligible after failing or having intolerance to one line of systemic chemotherapy used to treat the disease recurrence.
    Age between 18 and 75 years old
    Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status Assessment of 0 or 1.
    Must have radiographic measurable disease per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1.
    Life expectancy of at least 12 weeks (3 months).
    For patients who have received prior radiation, cryotherapy, radiofrequency ablation, therasphere, ethanol injection, transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) or photodynamic therapy, the following criteria must be met: 28 days have elapsed since that therapy; Lesions that have not been treated with local therapy must be present and measureable.
    Must be able to understand and be willing to sign the written informed consent form. Must be willing and able to comply with scheduled visits, treatment schedule, laboratory testing, and other study requirements.
    All acute toxic effects of any prior treatment have resolved to NCI-CTCAE v4.0 Grade 1 or less at the time of signing the Informed Consent Form (ICF) except for alopecia.
    Adequate bone marrow, liver and liver function.
    Women of childbearing potential must have a negative serum pregnancy test performed within 7 days prior to the start of study drug.
    Men and women of childbearing potential must agree to use adequate contraception beginning at the signing of the ICF until at least 3 months after the last dose of study drug.
    Exclusion Criteria:

    Pregnant or lactating women;
    History of other malignancies except cured basal cell carcinoma of skin and carcinoma insitu of uterine cervix;
    Uncontrolled hypertension;
    Intercurrence with one of the following: coronary artery disease, arrhythmia and heart failure;
    Urine protein>grade 1;
    Any factors that influence the usage of oral administration;
    Patients with a clear tendency of gastrointestinal bleeding;
    Abnormal coagulation function(INR≥1.5, APTT≥1.5 ULN);
    Abuse of alcohol or drugs;
    Less than 4 weeks from the last clinical trial;
    Prior treatment with antivascular endothelial growth factor or the other anti angiogenesis therapy;
    Active central nervous system (CNS). If CNS metastases are treated and potential participants are at neurologic baseline for at least 2 weeks prior to enrollment, they will be eligible but will need a Brain MRI prior to enrollment. 13. Disability of serious uncontrolled intercurrence infection.
    Contacts and Locations
    Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the Contacts provided below. For general information, see Learn About Clinical Studies.

    Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03144856

    Contacts
    Contact: Feng-Hua Wang, MD, PhD 86-020-87342490 wangfh@sysucc.org.cn

    Locations
    China, Guangdong
    Foshan people’s Hospital Recruiting
    Foshan, Guangdong, China
    Contact: Wei Wang 075783161035 m18038863618@163.com
    Cancer center of Sun Yat-sen University Recruiting
    Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510060
    Contact: Fenghua Wang, MD, PhD 86-020-87342490 wangfh@sysucc.org.cn
    Contact: Miao-Zhen Qiu, MD, PhD 86-020-87342490 qiumzh@sysucc.org.cn
    Principal Investigator: Rui-Hua Xu, MD, PhD
    Sponsors and Collaborators
    Sun Yat-sen University
    Jiangsu HengRui Medicine Co., Ltd.
    Investigators
    Principal Investigator: Rui-Hua Xu, MD, PhD Sun Yat-sen University
    More Information

    Responsible Party: Fenghua Wang, Professor, Sun Yat-sen University
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03144856 History of Changes
    Other Study ID Numbers: Apatinib_BTC
    Study First Received: May 5, 2017
    Last Updated: May 8, 2017
    Individual Participant Data
    Plan to Share IPD: No

    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: No
    Keywords provided by Sun Yat-sen University:
    Biliary Tract Cancer
    Second line thrapy
    Apatinib

    Additional relevant MeSH terms:
    Biliary Tract Neoplasms
    Digestive System Neoplasms
    Neoplasms by Site
    Neoplasms
    Biliary Tract Diseases
    Digestive System Diseases

    ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 12, 2017

    #13278
    76
    Spectator

    I was operated on for CC on 23rd October 2015. Followed by radiation therapy and chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin. Five weeks after chemo ended the first CT scan was clear, 3 mos later CT was clear. Next CT was supposed to be after 6 more mos but I was feeling tummy pains so I asked for it to be done at four and a half months. That scan was clear, that was about a month ago. By my calculations I figured there was a 76% chance that I had beaten this thing.
    .
    On the 13th April I went to the ER with stomach pains. They found problems with my stomach but they also found a CA19-9 of 1197, two weeks later it is at 1643. By my calculations the CA19-9 probably started rising about three months ago.
    .
    PETscan last week found a hotspot in my pancreas. EUS-FNA is tomorrow.
    .
    I figure the new tumor is about 1.7cm in diameter. Maybe it can be resected but maybe not.
    .
    I am mad at my oncologist because she wasn’t tracking CA19-9. The full-body CTscans cost thousands of dollars while the CA19-9 is about $6. If they had caught this thing when it was the size of a BB I am sure my prognosis would be better.
    .
    Can anybody think of a reason why they wouldn’t track CA19-9 routinely?

    gavin
    Moderator

    Phase 1b Multi-indication Study of Anetumab Ravtansine in Mesothelin Expressing Advanced Solid Tumors (ARCS-Multi)

    https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03102320

    Purpose
    The key purpose of the main part of the study is to assess efficacy and safety of anetumab ravtansine as monotherapy or combination therapy for mesothelin expressing advanced solid tumors.

    The main purpose of the safety lead-in (dose-finding) part of the study is to determine the safety and tolerability of anetumab ravtansine in combination with cisplatin and in combination with gemcitabine, and to determine the MTD of anetumab ravtansine in combination with cisplatin for mesothelin expressing advanced cholangiocarcinoma and in combination with gemcitabine for mesothelin expressing advanced adenocarcinoma of the pancreas.

    Patients will receive anetumab ravtansine every three weeks in monotherapy for most indications. In cholangiocarcinoma and adenocarinoma of the pancreas, 3-weekly anetumab ravtansine is administered in combination with cisplatin or gemcitabine respectively (both administered in a 2 week on / 1 week off schedule).

    Treatment will continue until disease progression or until another criterion for withdrawal is met. .Efficacy will be measured by evaluating the tumor’s objective response rate. Radiological tumor assessments will be performed at defined time points until the patient’s disease progresses.

    Blood samples will be collected for safety, pharmacokinetic and biomarker analysis. Archival or fresh biopsy tissue may also be collected for review and biomarkers.

    Condition Intervention Phase
    Neoplasms
    Drug: Cisplatin
    Drug: Gemcitabine
    Drug: Anetumab ravtansine (BAY94-9343)
    Phase 1

    Study Type: Interventional
    Study Design: Allocation: Non-Randomized
    Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
    Masking: No masking
    Primary Purpose: Treatment
    Official Title: Phase 1b Multi-indication Study of Anetumab Ravtansine (BAY94-9343) in Patients With Mesothelin Expressing Advanced or Recurrent Malignancies

    Resource links provided by NLM:

    MedlinePlus related topics: Cancer
    U.S. FDA Resources

    Further study details as provided by Bayer:

    Primary Outcome Measures:
    Maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of anetumab ravtansine in combination with cisplatin and in combination with gemcitabine in patients with mesothelin-expressing cholangiocarcinoma and pancreatic adenocarcinoma [ Time Frame: At least 3 weeks after the last patient starts treatment ]
    The highest dose of anetumab ravtansine that can be given so that not more than 1 out of 6 patients experiences a DLT (during the DLT evaluation period) will be declared as the MTD for anetumab ravtansine in combination with cisplatin or with gemcitabine

    Objective response rate (ORR) of anetumab ravtansine for monotherapy and combination therapy in mesothelin expressing advanced solid tumors [ Time Frame: 18 weeks after last patient starts treatment ]
    A patient is a responder if the patient has a tumor response of CR or PR, as determined per RECIST 1.1 criteria (ITMIG modified RECIST 1.1 criteria for thymic carcinoma). In the Phase 1b portion of this study, the ORR is defined separately in each indication and mesothelin expression cohort, as the number of responders divided by the number of treated patients in the indication and mesothelin expression cohort

    Secondary Outcome Measures:
    Number of serious and non-serious adverse events (AEs) [ Time Frame: 18 weeks after last patient starts treatment ]
    Include treatment-emergent AEs, SAEs, treatment-related AEs, AEs of special interest, and deaths.

    Disease control rate (DCR) [ Time Frame: 18 weeks after last patient starts treatment ]
    The DCR is defined as the number of patients with disease control divided by the number of treated patients.

    Duration of response (DOR) [ Time Frame: Approximately 24 months after last patient starts treatment ]
    DOR is defined in responders as the time from documentation of tumor response (CR or PR) to earlier of disease progression or death

    Durable response rate (DRR) [ Time Frame: Approximately 24 months after last patient starts treatment ]
    A durable responder is defined as a responder (CR or PR) with a duration of response per RECIST 1.1 criteria (ITMIG modified RECIST 1.1 criteria for thymic carcinoma) of 180 days or more. The DRR is the number of durable responders divided by the number of treated patients.

    Progression free survival (PFS) [ Time Frame: Approximately 24 months after last patient starts treatment ]
    PFS is defined as time from start of treatment until disease progression according to RECIST 1.1 (ITMIG modified RECIST 1.1 criteria for thymic carcinoma) or death.

    Estimated Enrollment: 348
    Anticipated Study Start Date: July 31, 2017
    Estimated Study Completion Date: February 11, 2020
    Estimated Primary Completion Date: May 31, 2019 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
    Arms Assigned Interventions
    Experimental: Cholangiocarcinoma
    Safety lead-in phase will determine the MTD of anetumab ravtansine administered in combination with cisplatin During the main study phase anetumab ravtansine will be administered at the determined MTD in combination with cisplatin
    Drug: Cisplatin
    Cisplatin 25 mg/m2 IV administered on day 1 and day 8 of 21 day cycle, for up to maximum 6 cycles
    Drug: Anetumab ravtansine (BAY94-9343)
    Anetumab ravtansine 6.5mg/kg IV in monotherapy indications. For combination indications, the MTD determined in safety lead in phase will be administered
    Experimental: Adenocarcinoma of the pancreas
    Safety lead-in phase will determine the MTD of anetumab ravtansine administered in combination with gemcitabine During the main study phase, anetumab ravtansine will be administered at the determined MTD in combination with gemcitabine
    Drug: Gemcitabine
    Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 IV administered on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle
    Drug: Anetumab ravtansine (BAY94-9343)
    Anetumab ravtansine 6.5mg/kg IV in monotherapy indications. For combination indications, the MTD determined in safety lead in phase will be administered
    Experimental: Other solid tumors
    (Non-small cell adenocarcinoma of the lung (NSCLC adenocarcinoma), Adenocarcinoma of the breast – triple negative (TNBC), Gastric adenocarcinoma including gastroesophageal junction (GEJ Cancer, Thymic carcinoma) During the main study phase, anetumab ravtansine will be administered at dose of 6.5 mg/kg in solid tumors
    Drug: Anetumab ravtansine (BAY94-9343)
    Anetumab ravtansine 6.5mg/kg IV in monotherapy indications. For combination indications, the MTD determined in safety lead in phase will be administered

    Eligibility

    Ages Eligible for Study: 18 Years and older (Adult, Senior)
    Sexes Eligible for Study: All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
    Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria:

    Availability of tumor tissue for mesothelin expression testing
    Histologically-confirmed, mesothelin-expressing metastatic or advanced non-metastatic disease (tumour type specific inclusion criteria)
    At least one measurable lesion according to either Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 or International Thymic Malignancy Interest Group (ITMIG) modified RECIST 1.1 as applicable
    Adequate bone marrow, liver, renal and coagulation function
    Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥ 50% of the lower limit of normal (LLN) according to local institutional ranges
    Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 0 or 1
    Exclusion Criteria:

    More than one prior anti-tubulin/microtubule agent
    Corneal epitheliopathy or any eye disorder that may predispose the patients to this condition
    Symptomatic Central nervous system (CNS) metastases and/or carcinomatous meningitis
    Contraindication to both CT and MRI contrast agents
    Active hepatitis B or C infection
    Pregnant or breast-feeding patients
    Tumor type specific exclusion criteria
    Contacts and Locations
    Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the Contacts provided below. For general information, see Learn About Clinical Studies.

    Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03102320

    Contacts
    Contact: Bayer Clinical Trials Contact clinical-trials-contact@bayer.com
    Contact: For trial location information (Phone Menu Options ‘3’ or ‘4’) (+)1-888-84 22937

    Show 57 Study Locations
    Sponsors and Collaborators
    Bayer
    More Information

    Responsible Party: Bayer
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03102320 History of Changes
    Other Study ID Numbers: 15834
    2016-004002-33 ( EudraCT Number )
    Study First Received: March 30, 2017
    Last Updated: April 5, 2017
    Individual Participant Data
    Plan to Share IPD: No

    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: Yes
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: No
    Keywords provided by Bayer:
    cholangiocarcinoma
    pancreatic cancer
    triple-negative breast cancer
    non-small cell lung cancer
    thymic carcinoma
    gastric including gastroesophageal junction cancer

    Additional relevant MeSH terms:
    Gemcitabine
    Cisplatin
    Maytansine
    Immunoconjugates
    Antineoplastic Agents
    Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic
    Antimetabolites
    Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
    Antiviral Agents
    Anti-Infective Agents
    Enzyme Inhibitors
    Immunosuppressive Agents
    Immunologic Factors
    Physiological Effects of Drugs
    Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic
    Tubulin Modulators
    Antimitotic Agents
    Mitosis Modulators

    ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on April 07, 2017

    gavin
    Moderator

    Not Yet Open.

    Percutaneous Hepatic Perfusion vs. Cisplatin/Gemcitabine in Patients With Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

    Purpose
    This study will evaluate two groups of patients who have intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Each group will receive induction treatment with Cisplatin and Gemcitabine per SOC for 4 treatment cycles. Following induction treatment patients will be randomize (1:1), to 2 arms of treatment. One group (50%) will be receive high dose chemotherapy delivered specifically to the liver, while the other group (50%) will continue treatment with Cisplatin and Gemcitabine. Patient in each group will get repeating cycles of treatment until the cancer advances. All patients will be followed until death. This study will compare the overall survival (OS) in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

    Condition Intervention Phase
    Bile Duct Cancer
    Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma
    Combination Product: Melphalan/HDS
    Drug: Cisplatin and Gemcitabine
    Phase 2
    Phase 3

    Study Type: Interventional
    Study Design: Allocation: Randomized
    Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
    Masking: No masking
    Primary Purpose: Treatment
    Official Title: Randomized, Controlled Study to Compare the Efficacy, Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Melphalan/HDS Treatment Given Sequentially Following Cisplatin/Gemcitabine Versus Cisplatin/Gemcitabine in Patients With IntraHepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

    Resource links provided by NLM:

    Genetics Home Reference related topics: cholangiocarcinoma
    Drug Information available for: Melphalan Melphalan hydrochloride Cisplatin Gemcitabine Gemcitabine hydrochloride
    Genetic and Rare Diseases Information Center resources: Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Bile Duct Cancer
    U.S. FDA Resources

    Further study details as provided by Delcath Systems Inc.:

    Primary Outcome Measures:
    Overall Survival [ Time Frame: Change in survival is being assessed through study completion, an average of 2 years ]
    Patients will be followed until death

    Secondary Outcome Measures:
    Progression-free survival, as determined by IRC [ Time Frame: Change in PFS change will be assessed every 9 weeks through study completion, an average of 1 year ]
    Period of time from 1st treatment to tumor progression or death

    Objective response rate (CR + PR) as determined by the Investigator [ Time Frame: ORR change will be assessed every 9 weeks through study completion, an average of 1 year ]
    The number of patients with either a complete or partial response as determined by the investigator

    Other Outcome Measures:
    Progression-free survival, as determined by the Investigator [ Time Frame: PFS change will be assessed every 9 weeks through study completion, an average of 1 year ]
    Period of time from 1st treatment to tumor progression

    Objective response rate as determined by IRC [ Time Frame: ORR change will assessed every 9 weeks through study completion, an average of one year ]
    The number of patients with either a complete or partial response as determined by the IRC

    Quality of Life (QOL) as measured by the functional health survey EQ-5D module [ Time Frame: QOL change will be evaluated every 6 weeks through study completion, an average of 1 year ]
    QoL will be evaluated for all patients treated in the study

    Pharmacokinetic Outcome Measures: Cmax [ Time Frame: PK is assessed at each Melphalan/HDS cycle approximately every 6 weeks for an average of one year ]
    Observed maximum concentration (Cmax)

    Pharmacokinetic Outcome Measures: AUC [ Time Frame: PK is assessed at each Melphalan/HDS cycle approximately every 6 weeks for an average of one year ]
    Area under the curve (AUC)

    Pharmacokinetic Outcome Measures: Tmax [ Time Frame: PK is assessed at each Melphalan/HDS cycle approximately every 6 weeks for an average of one year ]
    Time of maximum concentration (Tmax)

    Pharmacokinetic Outcome Measures: CL [ Time Frame: PK is assessed at each Melphalan/HDS cycle approximately every 6 weeks for an average of one year ]
    Total system clearance (CL)

    Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (Safety) [ Time Frame: Adverse events are assessed from time of informed consent through the study completion, average about 1 year ]
    Number of patients experiencing treatment related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE version 4.0

    Estimated Enrollment: 295
    Anticipated Study Start Date: September 2017
    Estimated Study Completion Date: May 2023
    Estimated Primary Completion Date: January 2023 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
    Arms Assigned Interventions
    Experimental: Melphalan/PHP
    Patients may receive up to 6 treatments of Melphalan/HDS 3.0 mg/kg IBW. Each treatment cycle consists of 6 weeks with an acceptable delay for an additional 2 weeks (i.e. 8 weeks in total). The maximum dose of melphalan will be 220 mg per treatment.
    Combination Product: Melphalan/HDS
    Melphalan/HDS treatment for up to six cycles, followed by a re-induction of CisGem.
    Other Name: Melphalan/PHP
    Active Comparator: Cisplatin and Gemcitabine
    Each Cis/Gem treatment cycle will comprise cisplatin, dosed at 25 mg per square meter of body surface area, and gemcitabine, dosed at 1000 mg per square meter of body surface area. Each will be administered on Days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks.
    Drug: Cisplatin and Gemcitabine
    continuous treatment with Cis/Gem until disease progression
    Other Name: Cis/Gem

    Detailed Description:
    The study will consist of 4 phases: a screening, an induction, randomization and follow-up phase.

    Screening phase: Screening assessments will be conducted within 28 days prior to initiation of Induction Phase treatment to determine each patient’s overall eligibility. These assessments will include medical history; physical examination; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS); 12 lead electrocardiogram (ECG); echocardiogram (ECHO); vital signs; laboratory assessments; radiologic assessments of disease status; and an evaluation of the vasculature compatibility for Percutaneous Hepatic Perfusion (PHP).

    Induction phase: The initial 12 weeks of the study, all patients will receive 4 cycles of cisplatin/gemcitabine. Each cycle will be comprised of cisplatin dosed at 25 mg per square meter of body-surface area (BSA), followed by gemcitabine dosed at 1000 mg per square meter of BSA; dosing will occur on Days 1 and 8 of each cycle. At the completion of 3 cycles (week 8 (+1 week)) of cisplatin/gemcitabine, an imaging scan is performed as per standard of care to determine if the patient has progressed on treatment or should continue receiving the cisplatin/gemcitabine induction therapy for one more cycle (4th cycle – prior to randomization). At the completion of 4 cycles (week 12 (+1 week)) of cisplatin/gemcitabine, patients will undergo whole-body imaging to determine the status of their disease. Patients with progressive disease (PD) will be discontinued from study treatment, and will receive further treatment to be determined by the principal investigator (PI). They will continue to be followed until death or the end of the study. Patients who have at least stable disease (SD) at imaging after induction phase of 4 cycles of cisplatin/gemcitabine (week 12 (+ 1 week)) will go on to the next phase of the study (Randomized Treatment Phase).

    Randomization phase: Patients who have at least stable disease via imaging at the end of the Induction Phase will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to Melphalan/HDS treatment or to continue cisplatin/gemcitabine in cycles previously described in the Induction Phase, until progressive disease (PD) or unacceptable toxicity is observed. Patients who were randomized to treatment with Melphalan/HDS (dosed at 3.0 mg/kg Ideal Body Weight [IBW]) must undergo their first treatment within 14 days following the whole body imaging performed at end of the Induction Phase. For Melphalan/HDS treatment, patients will receive up to 6 treatments. Each treatment cycle will consist of 6 weeks with an acceptable delay for up to another 2 weeks before the next planned treatment to allow for additional recovery, if needed. After the Melphalan/HDS treatment, in the absence of disease progression, the patient should undergo a re-induction of CisGem. Tumor response will be assessed in both treatment arms every 8 weeks (+ 1 week) until PD.

    The assessment scans will be reviewed by Independent Review Committee (IRC). At any time when PD is observed, the patient will be removed from further study treatment; any further treatment will be at the discretion of the investigator. Melphalan/HDS treatment will also be discontinued in the event that recovery requires more than 8 weeks from last treatment. An end-of-treatment visit will be conducted approximately 6 to 8 weeks following the final dose of study treatment. Ongoing adverse events (AEs) at the end-of-treatment visit will be followed until the severity returns to common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) Grade < 1. Follow-up phase: In the event that disease has not progressed at the end-of-treatment visit, disease assessment scans will continue every 8 weeks (+ 1 week) until PD is documented. Patients will be contacted by phone every 6 months for survival status for the first two years following the completion of study treatment, then yearly thereafter until death, withdrawal of informed consent or they become lost to follow-up, whichever occurs first. Patients will be monitored for two years following the completion of study treatment for the development of myelodysplasia and secondary leukemia. Eligibility Ages Eligible for Study: 18 Years and older (Adult, Senior)
    Sexes Eligible for Study: All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
    Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria:

    Are willing and able to provide signed informed consent.
    Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma diagnosed by histology.
    Unresectable ICC, with less than 50% of the liver involved, and without clinically significant extra-hepatic disease (regional lymph node lesions [≤ 2 cm] are acceptable) based on CT
    Scans used to determine eligibility (CT scan of the chest/abdomen/pelvis and liver) must be performed within 28 days prior to initiation of Induction Phase treatment.
    At least one target lesion based on the evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST 1.1).
    Patients must have an ECOG PS of 0-1 at screening.
    Male or female patients aged ≥ 18 years.
    Patients must weigh ≥ 35 kg (due to possible size limitations with respect to percutaneous catheterization of the femoral artery and vein using the Delcath Hepatic Delivery System).
    Exclusion Criteria:

    Greater than 50% tumor burden in the liver by imaging.
    History of orthotopic liver transplantation, hepatic vasculature incompatible with perfusion, hepatofugal flow in the portal vein or known unresolved venous shunting. Prior Whipple procedure is permitted provided the anatomy is still compatible for perfusion with the Melphalan/HDS system.
    History of, or known, hypersensitivity to any components of melphalan or the components of the Melphalan/HDS system.
    History of, or known, hypersensitivity to gemcitabine or platinum-containing compounds.
    Known hypersensitivity to heparin or the presence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.
    Prior treatment with gemcitabine or platinum-containing compounds, including in the adjuvant setting.
    Received an investigational agent for any indication within 30 days prior to first treatment.
    Prior radiation therapy to the liver including 90Y , I131 based loco regional therapy. Prior loco regional therapy, including resection, based on other technology for ICC, if any, must have been completed at least 4 weeks prior to baseline imaging.
    Not recovered from side effects of prior therapy to ≤ Grade 1 (according to National Cancer Institute [NCI] CTCAE version 4.03). Certain side effects that are unlikely to develop into serious or life-threatening events (e.g. alopecia) are allowed at > Grade 1.
    Those with New York Heart Association functional classification II, III or IV; active cardiac conditions including unstable coronary syndromes (unstable or severe angina, recent myocardial infarction), worsening or new-onset congestive heart failure, significant arrhythmias and severe valvular disease must be evaluated for risks of undergoing general anesthesia.
    History or evidence of clinically significant pulmonary disease that precludes the use of general anesthesia.
    Any evidence of severe or uncontrolled systemic diseases which, in the view of the investigator, makes it undesirable for the patient to participate in the trial (e.g. unstable or uncompensated respiratory, cardiac, hepatic or renal disease).
    Patients with active bacterial infections with systemic manifestations (malaise, fever, leukocytosis) are not eligible until completion of appropriate therapy. Patients taking low-dose antibiotics for biliary obstruction are exempted from this exclusion criterion.
    History of prior malignancy that will interfere with the response evaluation (exceptions include in-situ carcinoma of the cervix treated by cone-biopsy/resection, non-metastatic basal and/or squamous cell carcinomas of the skin, any early stage (stage I) malignancy adequately resected for cure greater than 5 years previously).
    Acute or active hepatitis B or hepatitis C infection. Patients with anti-hepatitis B core antigen (HBc) positive, or hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) but viral deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) negative are exception(s).
    History of bleeding disorders which would put a patient at risk for bleeding with anti-coagulation or patients with an increased risk of thromboembolic or hemorrhagic events (e.g., stroke).
    Brain lesions or intracranial abnormalities at risk for bleeding, by history or radiologic imaging (e.g., active metastases).
    Known varices at risk of bleeding, including medium or large esophageal or gastric varices, or active peptic ulcer.
    Inadequate hematologic function as evidenced by any of the following:
    Platelets < 100,000/µL
    Hemoglobin < 10.0 g/dL, independent of transfusion or growth factor support
    White blood cell count (WBC) < 2,000/µL
    Neutrophils < 1,500 cells/µL.
    Serum creatinine > 1.5 mg/dL. If serum creatinine > 1.5 mg/dL, the measured creatinine clearance must be measured and patient is eligible if creatinine clearance > 45 mL/min.
    Inadequate liver function as evidenced by any of the following:
    Total serum bilirubin > 1.5 times ULN
    Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) > 5 times the upper limit of normal (ULN) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) > 5 times ULN
    Serum albumin < 2.9 g/dL.
    Known alcohol or drug abuse that would preclude compliance with study procedures.
    For female patients of childbearing potential (defined as having had a menstrual period within the past 12 months): a positive serum pregnancy test (β-human chorionic gonadotropin [β HCG]) within 7 days prior to enrollment; or unwilling or unable to undergo hormonal suppression to avoid menstruation during treatment; or if breastfeeding, unwilling or unable to stop breastfeeding while on study treatment.
    Sexually active females of childbearing potential and sexually active males with partners of reproductive potential: unwilling or unable to use appropriate contraception from screening until at least 6 months after last administration of study treatment.
    Patients taking immunosuppressive drugs or who are unable to be temporarily removed from chronic anti-coagulation therapy.
    Patients with biliary stents.
    Patients with a history of external percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography catheter placement.
    Patients previously treated with any intra-arterial regional hepatic therapy such as trans-arterial chemoembolization.
    Patients with severe allergic reactions to iodine contrast which cannot be controlled by premedication with antihistamines and steroids.
    Patients with a latex allergy
    Contacts and Locations
    Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the Contacts provided below. For general information, see Learn About Clinical Studies.

    Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03086993

    Contacts
    Contact: LESLIE CALLAHAN, BSN, MS 212-489-2100 ext 247 LCALLAHAN@DELCATH.COM
    Contact: LARS BIRGERSON, MD lbirgerson@delcath.com

    Sponsors and Collaborators
    Delcath Systems Inc.
    More Information

    Responsible Party: Delcath Systems Inc.
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03086993 History of Changes
    Other Study ID Numbers: PHP-ICC-203
    Study First Received: March 13, 2017
    Last Updated: March 21, 2017
    Individual Participant Data
    Plan to Share IPD: No

    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: Yes
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: No
    Additional relevant MeSH terms:
    Cholangiocarcinoma
    Bile Duct Neoplasms
    Adenocarcinoma
    Carcinoma
    Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial
    Neoplasms by Histologic Type
    Neoplasms
    Biliary Tract Neoplasms
    Digestive System Neoplasms
    Neoplasms by Site
    Bile Duct Diseases
    Biliary Tract Diseases
    Digestive System Diseases
    Gemcitabine
    Cisplatin
    Melphalan
    Antineoplastic Agents
    Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic
    Antimetabolites
    Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
    Antiviral Agents
    Anti-Infective Agents
    Enzyme Inhibitors
    Immunosuppressive Agents
    Immunologic Factors
    Physiological Effects of Drugs
    Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating
    Alkylating Agents
    Myeloablative Agonists

    ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on March 23, 2017

    gavin
    Moderator

    Not Yet Open.

    Adjuvant Capecitabine vs Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin in Resected Extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

    Purpose
    There is no proven adjuvant treatment after curative surgical resection in patients with cholangiocarcinoma, although previous meta-analysis suggested potential survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy in patients with lymph node-positive resected cholangiocarcinoma. Despite of lack of level 1 evidence and no data which regimen is optimal, adjuvant chemotherapy is widely used in daily practice setting. Based on this background, the investigators designed the randomized phase 2 trial comparing capecitabine and gemcitabine plus cisplatin in patients with resected lymph node-positive extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

    Condition Intervention Phase
    Cholangiocarcinoma
    Biliary Tract Cancer
    Adjuvant Chemotherapy
    Capecitabine
    Gemcitabine
    Cisplatin
    Drug: Gemcitabine plus cisplatin
    Drug: Capecitabine
    Phase 2

    Study Type: Interventional
    Study Design: Allocation: Randomized
    Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
    Masking: No masking
    Primary Purpose: Treatment
    Official Title: Randomized Phase 2 Study of Capecitabine vs Gemcistabine Plus Cisplatin in Patients With Resected Extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma With Regional Lymph Node Metastasis

    Resource links provided by NLM:

    Genetics Home Reference related topics: cholangiocarcinoma
    Drug Information available for: Cisplatin Gemcitabine Gemcitabine hydrochloride Capecitabine
    Genetic and Rare Diseases Information Center resources: Biliary Tract Cancer
    U.S. FDA Resources

    Further study details as provided by Asan Medical Center:

    Primary Outcome Measures:
    2-year disease-free survival [ Time Frame: 2 years ]
    Proportion of patients without disease recurrence after 2 years

    Secondary Outcome Measures:
    Disease-free survival [ Time Frame: 4 years ]
    Median time point that 50% of study patients recur

    Toxicities (Adverse events related with chemotherapy) [ Time Frame: 4 years ]
    Adverse events related with chemotherapy

    Overall survival [ Time Frame: 4 years ]
    Median time point that 50% of study patients is alive

    Estimated Enrollment: 100
    Anticipated Study Start Date: April 2017
    Estimated Study Completion Date: April 2022
    Estimated Primary Completion Date: April 2021 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
    Arms Assigned Interventions
    Active Comparator: Capecitabine
    Adjuvant Capecitabine
    Drug: Capecitabine
    Capecitabine 1,250 mg/m2 Day 1 to 14, every 3 weeks
    Experimental: Gemcitabine plus cisplatin
    Adjuvant Gemcitabine plus Cisplatin
    Drug: Gemcitabine plus cisplatin
    Gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 and cisplatin 25 mg/m2 Day 1 and 8, every 3 weeks
    Other Name: Gemcitabine and cisplatin

    Eligibility

    Ages Eligible for Study: 19 Years and older (Adult, Senior)
    Sexes Eligible for Study: All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
    Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria:

    Patients aged 19 years and older
    Histologically documented extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (perihilar or distal bile duct tumor)
    Microscopic or macroscopic surgical resection (ie., R0 or R1 resection)
    Regional lymph node metastasis according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 7th edition
    No distant metastasis
    Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0 ~ 1
    No prior chemotherapy or radiotherapy
    Serum CA 19-9 < 100 U/mL at the time of enrollment
    Adequate bone marrow function as defined by platelets ≥ 100 x 109/L and neutrophils ≥ 1.5 x 109/L
    Adequate renal function, with serum creatinine < 1.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN)
    Adequate hepatic function with serum total bilirubin < 2 mg/dL, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) < 2.5 x ULN
    No other malignant disease apart from non-melanotic skin cancer or carcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix or any other non life-threatening cancer (i.e., prostate or thyroid cancer) except where treated with curative intent > 5 years previously without evidence of relapse Written informed consent to the study
    Exclusion Criteria:

    Medical or psychiatric conditions that compromise the patient’s ability to give informed consent or to complete the protocol or a history of non-compliance
    Histologies other than adenocarcinoma such as mixed hepatocellular carcinoma/cholangiocarcinoma, adenosquamous carcinoma or mixed adenocarcinoma/neuroendocrine carcinoma
    Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma or gallbladder cancer
    Obstruction of gastrointestinal tract
    Active gastrointestinal bleeding
    Myocardial infarction within 6 months prior to the study medication, and other clinically significant heart disease (e.g., unstable angina, congestive heart failure or uncontrolled hypertension)
    Evidence of severe or uncontrolled systemic disease or any concurrent condition which in the investigator’s opinion makes it undesirable for the patient to participate in the study or which would jeopardise compliance with the protocol
    Female subjects who are pregnant or lactating, or males and females of reproductive potential not willing or not able to employ a highly effective method of birth control/contraception to prevent pregnancy from 2 weeks before receiving study drug until 3 months after receiving the last dose of study drug. A highly effective method of contraception is defined as having a low failure rate (< 1% per year) when used consistently and correctly.
    Contacts and Locations
    Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the Contacts provided below. For general information, see Learn About Clinical Studies.

    Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03079427

    Contacts
    Contact: Chanhoon Yoo, MD +82-2-3010-1727 yooc@amc.seoul.kr

    Locations
    Korea, Republic of
    Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine
    Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 05505
    Sponsors and Collaborators
    Asan Medical Center
    Investigators
    Principal Investigator: Baek-Yeol Ryoo, MD Asan Medical Center
    More Information

    Publications:
    Horgan AM, Amir E, Walter T, Knox JJ. Adjuvant therapy in the treatment of biliary tract cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2012 Jun 1;30(16):1934-40. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.40.5381. Review.
    Valle J, Wasan H, Palmer DH, Cunningham D, Anthoney A, Maraveyas A, Madhusudan S, Iveson T, Hughes S, Pereira SP, Roughton M, Bridgewater J; ABC-02 Trial Investigators.. Cisplatin plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine for biliary tract cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010 Apr 8;362(14):1273-81. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0908721.
    Ramírez-Merino N, Aix SP, Cortés-Funes H. Chemotherapy for cholangiocarcinoma: An update. World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2013 Jul 15;5(7):171-6. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v5.i7.171.
    Neoptolemos JP, Moore MJ, Cox TF, Valle JW, Palmer DH, McDonald AC, Carter R, Tebbutt NC, Dervenis C, Smith D, Glimelius B, Charnley RM, Lacaine F, Scarfe AG, Middleton MR, Anthoney A, Ghaneh P, Halloran CM, Lerch MM, Oláh A, Rawcliffe CL, Verbeke CS, Campbell F, Büchler MW; European Study Group for Pancreatic Cancer.. Effect of adjuvant chemotherapy with fluorouracil plus folinic acid or gemcitabine vs observation on survival in patients with resected periampullary adenocarcinoma: the ESPAC-3 periampullary cancer randomized trial. JAMA. 2012 Jul 11;308(2):147-56. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.7352. Erratum in: JAMA. 2012 Nov 14;308(18):1861.
    Patt YZ, Hassan MM, Aguayo A, Nooka AK, Lozano RD, Curley SA, Vauthey JN, Ellis LM, Schnirer II, Wolff RA, Charnsangavej C, Brown TD. Oral capecitabine for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma, and gallbladder carcinoma. Cancer. 2004 Aug 1;101(3):578-86.
    Petekkaya I, Gezgen G, Roach EC, Solak M, Gullu I. Long-term advanced cholangiocarcinoma survivor with single-agent capecitabine. J BUON. 2012 Oct-Dec;17(4):796.

    Responsible Party: Baek-Yeol Ryoo, Professor, Asan Medical Center
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03079427 History of Changes
    Other Study ID Numbers: Asan-ONCHBP-2017-001
    Study First Received: March 9, 2017
    Last Updated: March 13, 2017
    Individual Participant Data
    Plan to Share IPD: No

    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: No

    #94324

    In reply to: In shock!

    marions
    Moderator

    Cinds….welcome to our special site. I am sorry to hear of the diagnosis. I have learned that metastasis prevent surgical resection however; the majority of patients are diagnosed at late stage. We have seen some great responses to current treatment options, don’t give up on hope. I suppose your sister’s first line of treatment consists of gemcitabine and cisplatin. Is there a next plan of action such as a clinical trial?
    Also, are you aware of AMMF, UK? Helen provides important information for our UK patient community.
    Please stay in touch and share with us the results of today’s PET scan.

    Hang in there, little sister, this is not an easy ride, but many others are in a similar situation and are here to talk about it.

    Hugs
    Marion

    #13101

    Topic: First scan

    richnkim
    Spectator

    Hello,

    Don’t even know where to start our lives have been turned upside down the last few months. What started out as what we thought was a gallbladder attack a few days before Christmas has turned into our worst nightmare.

    My husband is 55 and was diagnosed in Jan with stage 4 Intrahepatic Cholangiocarinoma with mets to the lungs. We have a 11 year old son who is taking this very hard.

    We did go to Mayo Clinic in Rochester MN for a second opinion and they gave us the same thing do nothing and live 3 months do chemo and maybe 1 year.

    So we are here at home doing chemo-Cisplatin and Gemcitabine. So far he is taking this pretty good just really tried and not wanting to eat much. He is done with the first round of chemo and he is going for his first ct scan this week. We are holding our breath hoping for the best.

    We are also talking with MD Anderson in Texas on the phone about maybe going down there for treatment. Where we live is very rural not uptodate on treatments so it’s very hard to get newer treatments around our area. I look online and ask the Dr. about giving my husband certain vit. like vit D3, Vit C, Folic Acid and all he says you can if you want. Then I asked if we could talk to a nutritionist and he set up the appt. and the lady was talking to us just fine about good foods and then asked what stage he was and we told her stage 4 and then she said if he wants a snickers candy bar for lunch have one, go thru McDonalds drivethru. We left soon after that.

    Sorry to be rambling on I haven’t had anyone to talk to about this. I took care of both of my parents who died of cancer I never thought in a million years I would be doing the same with my husband.

    gavin
    Moderator

    A case report of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome in a patient receiving gemcitabine and cisplatin.

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28225482

    #93934
    alikemal
    Spectator

    This INTRAHEPATIC CHOLANGIOCARCINOMA TREATMENT REGIMENS (Days 1 and 8: Cisplatin 25mg/m2 IV (1-hour infusion) followed by gemcitabine 1,000mg/m2 IV (0.5-hour infusion). ) do not have any positive effects.

    Our patient 70 years lady patient has 5 chemos.
    1. chemo 40 mg Cisplatin + 1200 mg gemcitabine
    2 chemo 1200 mg gemcitabine
    3 chemo 1200 mg gemcitabine
    4 chemo 1200 mg gemcitabine
    5 chemo 1200 mg gemcitabine

    The CEA ab C19-9 tumor markers are increasing.

    If The Oncologist will stop chemo, which treatments can be tried ?

    gavin
    Moderator

    Durvalumab(MEDI4736)/Tremelimumab in Combination With Gemcitabine/Cisplatin in Chemotherapy-naïve Biliary Tract Cancer

    Not yet open.

    https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03046862

    Purpose
    The dynamics of immune systems by cytotoxic chemotherapy and its changes by combination with immuno-oncology agents will be uncovered.

    The combination of Durvalumab/Tremelimumab with gemcitabine/cisplatin chemotherapy is feasible and efficacious in chemo-naïve biliary tract cancer.

    To assess the effect of Durvalumab/Tremelimumab in combination with gemcitabine/cisplatin on response rate (RR) in chemo-naïve advanced biliary tract cancer patients.

    Condition Intervention Phase
    Biliary Tract Neoplasms
    Drug: Durvalumab
    Drug: Tremelimumab
    Drug: Gemcitabine
    Drug: Cisplatin
    Phase 2

    Study Type: Interventional
    Study Design: Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment
    Masking: No masking
    Primary Purpose: Treatment
    Official Title: Biomarker-oriented Study of Durvalumab(MEDI4736)/Tremelimumab in Combination With Gemcitabine/Cisplatin in Chemotherapy-naïve Biliary Tract Cancer

    Resource links provided by NLM:

    MedlinePlus related topics: Cancer
    Drug Information available for: Cisplatin Gemcitabine Gemcitabine hydrochloride
    Genetic and Rare Diseases Information Center resources: Biliary Tract Cancer
    U.S. FDA Resources

    Further study details as provided by Seoul National University Hospital:

    Primary Outcome Measures:
    Response rate [ Time Frame: 6 weeks ]
    According to RECIST v1.1 criteria

    Secondary Outcome Measures:
    Disease control rate [ Time Frame: 6 weeks ]
    Progression-free survival [ Time Frame: 6 weeks ]
    Duration of response [ Time Frame: 1 year ]
    Overall survival [ Time Frame: 1 year ]
    Quality-of-life [ Time Frame: 1 year ]
    EORTC QLQ-BIL21

    Overall response rate [ Time Frame: 6 week ]
    According to immune-related response criteria

    Toxicity [ Time Frame: 6 week ]
    CTCAE V4.1

    Estimated Enrollment: 31
    Anticipated Study Start Date: March 2017
    Estimated Study Completion Date: March 2019
    Estimated Primary Completion Date: December 2018 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
    Arms Assigned Interventions
    Experimental: Durvalumab/Tremelimumab+chemotherapy
    Durvalumab and Tremelimumab in combination with gemcitabine/cisplatin.
    Drug: Durvalumab
    Durvalumab 1.12 g iv on D1 every 3 weeks
    Other Name: MEDI4736
    Drug: Tremelimumab
    Tremelimumab 75mg iv on D1 every 3 weeks
    Drug: Gemcitabine
    Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 iv on D1& D8 every 3 weeks
    Drug: Cisplatin
    Cisplatin 25 mg/m2 iv on D1& D8 every 3 weeks

    Detailed Description:

    Rational #1. The incidence of biliary tract cancer (BTC) is higher in Korea than the West. (Korea: 10 new cases/100,000 population every year, the West:1-2 cases/100,100 population every year). Therefore, to conduct clinical study of BTC in Korea is very feasible and efficient.
    Rational #2 The Gemcitabine/cisplatin is the current standard of care in 1st-line treatment for advanced BTC ((N Engl J Med 2010; 362 (14): 1273-81). No one-targeted therapy has been approved in BTC, yet. The overall survival of advanced BTC with cytotoxic chemotherapy is only 8-10 months, in general. Therefore, there is a huge unmet medical need.
    Rational #3 In recent sequencing data of BTC showed the BTC patients with the worse prognosis had significant enrichment of hypermutated tumors and a characteristic elevation in the expression of immune checkpoint molecules. According, immune-modulating therapies also be potentially promising options for these patients (Nat Genet. 2015 Sep;47(9):1003-10.)
    Rational #4 In PDL1 (+) BTC, anti-PD1 Ab shows promising activity as a monotherapy (Bang YJ, et al. ECC/ESMO 2015) In one clinical study of pembrolizumab, 37 out of 89 BTC patients (41.6%) showed the PDL1 (+) tumor. Among 24 PDL1 (+) patients who were enrolled and treated with pembrolizumab, 50% were Asian, 62.5% had ECOG 1, 16.7% had gallbladder cancer, 80% were at the 3rd-line or later setting. Four patients showed PR (3 from Seoul National University Hospital), 4 patients SD, which led the overall response rate of 17.4%. A total 40% of patients showed tumor shrinkage. The decreases in tumor size were generally maintained over time. This study gives us the evidence that immune checkpoint inhibitor is working on BTC likewise other solid tumors.
    Rational #5 In recent studies have shown the combination of CTLA4 inhibitor with anti-PD1/PDL1 agents shows the enhanced clinical activities, especially, regardless of PDL1 status. This combination strategy is being actively under test in many solid tumors.
    Rational #6 Certain chemotherapeutic drugs stimulate cancer-specific immune responses by inducing immunogenic cell death and other effector mechanisms (Immunity 2013, Annu Rev Immunol 2013) With the cytotoxic chemotherapy, the PDL-1 is induced and this increased expression of PDL1 contributes the resistance to cytotoxic chemotherapy. Successful eradication of tumors by immunogenic chemotherapy requires removal of immunosuppressive IgA+, PDL1+plasmocytes (Nature 2015). More importantly, still vast majorities of dynamic changes of immune system by cytotoxic chemotherapy are unanswered. These support that the combination of cytotoxic chemotherapy with immuno-oncology agents including immune checkpoint inhibitors might be efficacious and needed.
    Rational #7 The advantages of “Immunotherapy and cytotoxic chemotherapy” combination are; 1) can explore science on the dynamic immunologic changes by cytotoxic chemotherapy and its overcome by immunotherapy 2) easy way to be incorporated in the current clinical practice 3) can be applied to variety of tumor types such as NSCLC, urothelial cancer. 4) relatively affordable than “immunotherapy and targeted agent” combination. Durvalumab/Tremelimumab in combination of cytotoxic chemotherapy has not been tested, especially in BTC.
    Primary efficacy endpoint is response rate. In BTC, the response rate of 1st-line gemcitabine/cisplatin chemotherapy is about 20% (20% in BT22 clinical trial, 25% in ABC-02 clinical trial). Therefore, we set H0 as 20%, and H1 as 40%. Using 75% of power and a-error of 0.05, a total 28 patients will be needed. When we assume the drop-out rate of 10%, a total of 31 patients will be enrolled.

    Eligibility

    Ages Eligible for Study: 18 Years and older (Adult, Senior)
    Sexes Eligible for Study: All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
    Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria:

    Histologically proven BTC, including intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, extrahepatic bile duct cancer, gallbladder cancer, ampulla of vater cancer
    Unresectable or recurrent
    chemotherapy -naïve for their unresectable or recurrent cancer (Previous expose to adjuvant chemotherapy is allowed)
    should have measurable lesion
    ECOG 0, 1
    Without previous expose to immune-oncology agents including anti-CTLA4, anti-PD1, anti-PDL1, etc
    Adequate organ function : ANC>1500/mm3, platelet>100K/mm3, HgB>9 g/Dl, bilirubin<1.5 x ULN, ALT/AST<2.5 X UNL, (in case of liver metastasis, <5 Xunl), Cr<1.5 mg/Dl
    Informed consent
    Exclusion Criteria:

    Previous treatment for unresectable or recurrent cancer
    Under immunosuppressive agents higher than equivalent dose of prednisone 10mg/day
    Uncontrolled disease such as current active infection, congestive heart failure, uncontrolled hypertension, unstable angina, arrhythmia, interstitial lung disease
    Current active pulmonary tuberculosis
    Current active hepatitis B or hepatitis C (simple carrier is allowed)
    anti-HIV (+)
    Pregnant, breast-feeding women
    Contacts and Locations
    Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the Contacts provided below. For general information, see Learn About Clinical Studies.

    Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03046862

    Contacts
    Contact: Oh ohdoyoun@snu.ac.kr

    Locations
    Korea, Republic of
    Seoul National University Hospital
    Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 110-744
    Sponsors and Collaborators
    Seoul National University Hospital
    Investigators
    Principal Investigator: Do youn Oh, MD, PhD Seoul National University Hospital
    More Information

    Responsible Party: Do-Youn Oh, Professor, Seoul National University Hospital
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03046862 History of Changes
    Other Study ID Numbers: BTC-1st MEDITREME
    Study First Received: February 6, 2017
    Last Updated: February 7, 2017
    Individual Participant Data
    Plan to Share IPD: No

    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: Yes
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: No
    Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.: No

    gavin
    Moderator

    Combination of anti-L1 cell adhesion molecule antibody and gemcitabine or cisplatin improves the therapeutic response of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28166242

    #93932
    karend
    Spectator

    Ali,

    Regarding the ABC-02 trial,

    Bridgewater, et al. published a really wonderful paper on cholangio in 2014. I have referenced it many times in projects I have worked on.

    Regarding ABC-02 trial standard of care chemo (this is Gemzar (Gebcitabine) and Cisplatin.

    Gemcitabine and Cisplatin systemic therapy is standard of care for non-resectable disease if the patient has a good performance status with a median survival of 11.2 months versus 7.7 (Bridgewater et al.,2014).

    Here is the citation:
    Bridgewater, J., Galle, P., Khan, S., Llovet, J., Park, J.W., Patel, T., Pawlik, T., & Gores, G. (2014). Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Journal of Hepatology, 60(6), 1268-1289. doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2014.01.021

    I hope this helps you.

    -Karen

Viewing 15 results - 166 through 180 (of 676 total)