Earlier Detection Value of PET Scan in CCA compare to CT and MRI

Discussion Board Forums Radiation Treatments & Options Earlier Detection Value of PET Scan in CCA compare to CT and MRI

Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #75252
    mcwgoat
    Spectator

    I have Aetna and they’ve always paid for my PET scans. Maybe it depends on the type of coverage plan you have.

    Mary

    #75251
    gavin
    Moderator

    Thanks for that Percy.

    #75250
    marions
    Moderator

    I made sure to print out pertinent information (such as the one Percy posted) and presented to the physician and forward to Insurance Company, if procedure was denied. The problem with our disease is that Insurance companies are rigid with their adherence to the “very few” standards set by their Industry. Obtaining one of their caseworkers at onset of diagnoses helps tremendously with all aspects of insurance claims.
    As we all know, in comparison to other cancers, we are a minute group hence, in order to make pertinent changes, we have to fight for everything not considered “standard” of care for Cholangiocarcinoma.
    Hugs,
    Marion

    #75249
    willow
    Spectator

    Love to you all too! I’ve believed the same all along about PET scans and wondered why they’re not used regularly to monitor cancer activity (rapid uptake of glucose), not just measuring the tumor size as CT and MRI’s do… especially when we’ve heard cases where there the tumor bulk is remaining but upon surgical inspection its found to be dead as a door-nail!
    Insurance dictates the treatment/diagnostics rather than “standard of care”. Obviously, Most people don’t have the resources to pay for regular scans out of pocket.
    XO
    Willow

    #75248
    willow
    Spectator

    Love to you all too!

    #75247
    willow
    Spectator

    Love to you all too!

    #75246
    lainy
    Spectator

    Hi Kris, Percy and Lisa. Way back when…it seemed Teddy’s Insurance denied every other PET and he was getting them every 6 months. Then when the ONC stepped up to bat for him they always said yes. BTW on one of his last PETS I was feeling they were NOT going to come through so started hunting around and found an Imaging Center that did PETS for about 1500.00. I can’t believe that just 2 days ago I read where PETS are still the best for detecting Cancer but sorry can’t remember where or when! AS ALWAYS ‘LOVE’ YOU ALL!

    #75245
    pcl1029
    Member

    Hi,Lisa and Kris,

    I am sorry to hear that, I live in the States too, but may be our insurance are different. I have no problem with the insurance company. Or may be it is not an uncommon practice around the oncologist group practice that I go to.

    I got a CT scan and shown 2 lesions ,one with foci and the other not. Then the doctor ordered a PET to follow, within 7 days ,and discovered another soft issue foci developed in one of the lymph node nearby, (1.9×0.8cm);small enough to give me more option to decide on treatments. CCA is a “relative slow growth CA”
    So your oncologist or health provider and health insurance may say no .

    In my case, I verified above what the article stated and that is my intention .
    God bless.

    #75244
    kris00j
    Spectator

    Thanks Percy. Unfortunately, here in the States anyway, PET scans are not acceptable options for cc patients. My previous onc and I had to fight AETNA like crazy to get approval for ONE PET scan!

    #75243
    lisacraine
    Spectator

    Percy,
    Thank you, my last PET scan was denied coverage and I have another scan coming up in September.
    Hugs
    Lisa

    #8852
    pcl1029
    Member

    Hi, everyone,

    PET is in general a better method in detecting EARLIER metastases outside og the liver for CCA comparing to CT and MRI. (under cholangiocarcinmoma section in the link)

    http://www.ajronline.org/doi/full/10.2214/AJR.11.6995

    God bless.

Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)
  • The forum ‘Radiation Treatments & Options’ is closed to new topics and replies.