YELIVA – ABC294640 Trial
Discussion Board › Forums › Clinical Trials › YELIVA – ABC294640 Trial
Tagged: yeliva
- This topic has 16 replies, 7 voices, and was last updated 4 years ago by fquail.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 8, 2020 at 12:23 pm #100580fquailSpectator
Sorry for not providing an update. I had progression confirmed this summer (primarily a met to one of my ribs) and had to go off the trial. Back on gem/cis (for the fourth time). Looks like it’s working some: a late September scan showed no progression and some shrinkage. And my CA 19-9, which has already been a good indicator, has dropped from almost 1600 to less than 300. Next scan, Thanksgiving week.
November 8, 2020 at 5:24 am #100577vtkbSpectatorDear Fred-
Any updates? Are you still in the trial for Yeliva? Anyone else on here been on it?
January 27, 2020 at 10:30 pm #99624bglassModeratorHi Fred,
Happy to hear more good news about your experience with this trial – thank you for sharing.
Regards, Mary
January 24, 2020 at 8:40 am #99612fquailSpectatorI had my second “on trial” scan last Saturday and reviewed the results at Emory yesterday. So far, still good: no progression. Excerpts from the summary of the radiologist’s “impressions”:
- Stable
- Stable
- Decreased
- No new or enlarging sites of disease
I’ve now been on the trial for 16 weeks. No side effects to speak of. I’ll have bloodwork next the week of 2/20 and the next scan should be on or about 3/16. I’ll continue to report results/status and welcome feedback from anyone else on this trial. Thanks.
Fred
December 16, 2019 at 6:16 pm #99441bglassModeratorHi Fred,
Thank you for sharing this good news that your results so far show stability. There is a lot of interest in our community about this and other new drugs on the horizon that bring us more and, hopefully, better treatment options.
Fingers crossed that good results continue.
Regards, Mary
December 16, 2019 at 6:08 am #99438fquailSpectatorWell, it’s still early, but decent results so far. I had my first “on trial” scan on December 2, and reviewed the results with Dr. Akce, my Emory oncologist and the PI for this trial at Emory, on December 5. The tumor had earlier been measured as 2.6 x 1.6 cm. In this scan it was reported at 2.8 x 1.8 cm, within the limits to conclude no progression and for me to remain on the trial. Dr. Akce also noted that it has been very difficult to precisely measure this tumor and there was a pretty good chance it really hasn’t grown at all. There has been no spread, and I have had really no side effects from the trial drug.
I will have my next scan at the end of January.
Fred
December 15, 2019 at 11:55 am #99437LitvakSpectatorHi Fred,
maybe the results regarding the effectiveness of YELIVA are in?
– MB
October 20, 2019 at 4:39 pm #99189bglassModeratorHi Fred,
Thank you for the update, and congratulations on starting this trial. Fingers crossed the trial med brings you great results!
Take care, regards, Mary
October 19, 2019 at 11:16 am #99187fquailSpectatorWell, I finally started on this trial a bit over two weeks ago. So far no real side effects to report. I won’t get much of an idea about the effectiveness until my next scan in late November. I’ll keep this thread updated.
Fred
July 14, 2019 at 12:56 pm #98863bglassModeratorHi Fred,
Thank you for your note. I looked through the discussion board and while there is discussion about possibly seeking this treatment, I did not find any patients who wrote about being treated with Yeliva. I also contacted a caregiver who was looking into it, and that patient did not in the end pursue Yeliva either. Hopefully, if a patient or caregiver who is under Yeliva treatment sees this string, they will post on their experience.
If you do enroll in this trial, I hope you will keep us posted.
Regards, Mary
July 12, 2019 at 4:27 pm #98857fquailSpectatorI may be going on this now Phase II trial. I’ll be meeting with Emory’s chief investigator on the trial within two weeks. Anyone have any more recent experience with this? Thanks.
Fred
March 21, 2016 at 5:41 pm #91945mikebSpectatorThanks Gavin – that’s all great info
March 19, 2016 at 1:13 pm #91941gavinModeratorHi Mike,
Welcome to the site. Here is another page with some links on Yeliva for you. Hope that they are of use and interest to you and I look forward to hearing more from you.
http://www.cholangiocarcinoma.org/punbb/viewtopic.php?id=14624
Best wishes,
Gavin
March 18, 2016 at 3:16 am #91944marionsModeratorA bit more, Mike….. Angiogenesis plays a critical role in the growth and spread of cancer. A blood supply is necessary for tumors to grow beyond a few millimeters in size. Tumors can cause this blood supply to form by giving off chemical signals that stimulate angiogenesis. Tumors can also stimulate nearby normal cells to produce angiogenesis signaling molecules. The resulting new blood vessels “feed” growing tumors with oxygen and nutrients, allowing the cancer cells to invade nearby tissue, to move throughout the body, and to form new colonies of cancer cells, called metastases.
Because tumors cannot grow beyond a certain size or spread without a blood supply, scientists are trying to find ways to block tumor angiogenesis. They are studying natural and synthetic angiogenesis inhibitors, also called antiangiogenic agents, with the idea that these molecules will prevent or slow the growth of cancer.
Hugs
MarionMarch 18, 2016 at 3:00 am #91943mikebSpectatorThanks so much Marion:
Another article out yesterday. Was Mayo the Phase I? Interesting that it was ‘non-clinical’…
http://tcbmag.com/News/Recent-News/2016/March/Mayo-Researchers-Make-Progress-In-Fight-Against-Ma
I understood that it was an inhibitor – but some hope in the this statement
“The Mayo researchers, along with Dr. Smith and others, concluded that Yeliva’s targeting of SK2 in the affected cells inhibited cancer proliferation and induced apoptosis – or self-destruction – in the cholangiocarcinoma cells.”
thx! Mike B
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Clinical Trials’ is closed to new topics and replies.