ron-smith

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 130 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Update from Ron Smith #15490
    ron-smith
    Member

    Joyce and Kate

    Many thanks for your kind thoughts. With Margaret’s surgery coming up and the delay in the start of my chemo we decided to have a holiday, so tomorrow we set off for two weeks in Florida. Keeping our fingers crossed that the sun keeps shining, even though everyone in the South seems to be praying for rain. Travel insurance was interesting. We have had “free” annual worldwide policy through our bank for several years but had to advise them of my current medical condition. I felt sorry for the chap on the other end of the ‘phone when I told him about my cancer and my angina and that we were going to the USA. I am sure I heard the Thump! as his jaw hit his desk. The result was that they would not cover me for anything directly or indirectly related to my condition, which did not leave much to cover. I then went to a specialist insurer and, for me only, I obtained cover for the two weeks at a cost of

    in reply to: Update from Ron Smith #15487
    ron-smith
    Member

    Hi Jerry

    Thanks for your words of encouragement. We have discussed before the benefits of having a positive attitude; you bear that out and I do my best. Sorry to hear about the liver damage and hope it doesn’t prove to be too much of a problem. It is good news about the SIRS Spheres (Y-90 beads). I have had informal type chats about this with my oncologist but, at present, he wants to try the gemcitabine first then look at trying other things if it is not successful. He tells me he is on the Board of several clinical trials so this could be a route in the future.

    I hope I have not upset people by drawing comparisons between the health systems in the UK and US. It is so easy to slam the NHS in the UK, but in most cases it does provide free healthcare when it is needed. It is not perfect and you will always be able to find cases where it has not performed well. But at a time when you are probably under the greatest stress it is reassuring to know that you will receive the care without having to worry about the cost or fight with your insurer.

    Humour is a bit thin on the ground in Scotland, just now, following the recent defeat of the national football (soccer) team by Italy in the final European Championships group game. The cry “we wuz robbed” could be heard on the mountains, through the glens and in most of the local hostelries up and down the nation, as an outrageously incompetent decision by the referee, one minute from the end, resulted in Italy scoring the winner. Worse, it allowed France, who we had already beaten home and away, to steal our place in the finals next year. Another glorious defeat in the long history of glorious sporting defeats! Never mind, The World Cup 2010 campaign will be starting shortly and the dream will be revived again. I just hope we are all still going about then and I can regale you about a glorious victory.

    All the best
    Ron

    in reply to: Dr. Jerome Canady #17770
    ron-smith
    Member

    I first read about Cindy several weeks ago on another site and my first thought was “Oh dear, this family are setting themselves up for a huge disappointment.”. Any of us who have been through this know that you cannot say you are cured, especially within 6 months of surgery. But not wishing to dismiss it out of hand, I googled Dr Canady and found all the reports about his time spent in litgation, arguments with his employers and his inventions. This caused me some concern because litigation is notoriously time consuming as are the processes required for new inventions. My final conclusions at that time were “When does this man find time to perform surgery and is his main concern the marketing of his invention?”

    I thought that the interest in him would disappear quite quickly but this has not been the case and I can understand the reason people have seen Dr Canady as some type of miracle worker. But the more I think about it the more concerned I have become. None of the doctors I have met through my own treatments would in any way encourage or condone the claims being made about the surgery. I do not know if Dr Canady has done either but he must be aware of the publicity and the effect it has had but appears to have done nothing to give a more balanced view. It does occur to me that, at a time when Dr Canady is in dispute with his current hospital about having his privileges revoked, it cannot be doing his personal standing any harm to have a large number of potential new patients, from all round the world, clambering to have consultations with him.

    Ron

    in reply to: mother newly dx #16403
    ron-smith
    Member

    Hi rrutherford6

    Sorry to har about your mother. I think the doctors were probably referring to a procedure called Radio Frequency Ablation. This uses heat to zap tumours. You can read more about it on:

    http://www.surgery.usc.edu/divisions/hep/radiofrequencyablation.html

    All the best
    Ron

    ron-smith
    Member

    Hello Nancy
    I, too, am sad to hear about your friend. When you read the posts on this site you will discover that everyone’s story is different and it is impossible to give definitive answers to most of the questions asked particularly those related to diagnosis, treatment and prognosis. The best that can be offered is to give the benfit of our own experiences. In my case, I was diagnosed with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in July 2006 and had part of my right lobe resected in August. I was in hospital for 5 days and recovered from the surgery very well. Unfortunately the cancer returned but I was again a suitable candidate for surgery. The whole of my right lobe was removed on 29 March 2007. Again my stay in hospital was short – 6 days this time – but I felt it was harder to recover this time. This was probably because the surgery was much longer, 6 hours compared with 4 hours last year and much of the trauma to my body caused by the first surgery had not fully healed.

    The length of the stay in hospital will be different for each individual and will depend on the extent of the surgery, the individual’s own ability to heal, the mental state of the patient and, last but not least, the skill of the surgeons and medical staff. I wouldn’t have thought there was any need to stay in New York after being released from hospital, however, he will probably have to return to New York on a regular basis, say every 3 months, to meet with the surgeon and the oncologist and to undergo subsequent tests and scans.

    When he can return to work will depend on many factors, not least of which is the type of work done. I am an accountant and much of my work is done with computers. After my first surgery I was able to start working from home within a couple of weeks of leaving hospital. I built up the amount of work I was doing over the next few weeks and returned to the office full time in January. This time, I have not felt up to doing any office work, not because of physical limitations but rather, mentally, I have not wanted to do any. I have found it really difficult to get excited about auditing historical company accounts when I know that the cancer can return at any time. On top of that I was taken into hospital in May, following the start of a chemotherapy trial, and was diagnosed with angina so that has not helped with the mental process!
    I have my first post-op CT scan on Friday followed by a meeting with my surgeon on Tuesday and I am really quite concerned about it. Historically the reults have not been good. Perhaps if I get the all clear this time I will feel more like returning to work. Perhaps not!!

    I can only wish your friend the very best of luck for the future. The road ahead for him will be very difficult and there will be times when he will need lots of support and other times when he will just want his own counsel. Be there for him.

    All the best
    Ron

    in reply to: Post surgery questions #15945
    ron-smith
    Member

    Hi Kris

    It is difficult to know what the signs of recurrance will be and so I would go along with what Jeff said and look for the signs you had originally, but bring anything new and unexplained to the attention of your doctors. In my own case, I didn’t have any real symptoms when I had my first surgery in August 2006. In fact I felt great. I felt the same when I had my follow up CT scan in February; but it had returned. With the benefit of hindsight I now realise that prior to August I had a rash (not itchy) on both arms. This disappeared after the surgery but was definately coming back in February. It again disappeared after my last surgery so now I watch for it all the time. It may have nothing to do with the cancer but it was a bit of a coincidence.

    As for the stomach noises, well I get this too, off and on and put it down to the fact that the bile is not being stored but is being produced, I would imagine, as you need it and going straight into your intestines. There are probably times when more is produced than at other times.

    I have a degree of sympathy for your oncologist. They really do not have many answers when it comes to people like us who have had surgery. You have already read my story about the chemo trial and this trial is being run to see if there is any benefit in giving chemo after surgery. So, at present, the situation seems to be that the accepted protocol is that there is no benefit. As for signs of recurrence, the problem would seem to be that there are various signs so, apart from the serious and generally the too late signs of jaundice, weight loss etc you are possibly not going to be aware of any signs so it is difficuklt for anyone to advise you on what to look out for. You are fortunate to be receiving 3-monthly CT scans. At least this should bring any signs of recurrence to your doctor’s attention quickly.

    As for the effects on having children I will also have to side step this one apart from saying that any of the chemo drugs I have looked at do make special mention of people who are pregnant or thinking about starting a family.

    Did you manage to follow up on the chemo trial with Professor Garden? I have now been back to see Professor Evans at the Beatson and he has stopped me taking the Xeloda. Apparently, in rare cases, it brings on chest pains and can cause a heart attack. I am being kept on the trial for follow up tests and so will be getting
    3-monthly CT scans.

    All the best

    Ron

    in reply to: Photodynamic Therapy #15942
    ron-smith
    Member

    Stacie
    This was the first I had heard of PDT. The TV programme discussed the cancers that approval has already been given for and the doctor, who is a regular contributor, seemed to feel it was a major breakthrough in the fight against cancer. It was the website that provided details of the trials for BDC. This was the part that really caught my imagination because, as you will know, it is very unusual for specific mention to be made of research into cures for BDC.

    Patricia

    I have to confess that I was so keen to get the info about PDT on this site that I did not take the time to read previous postings so was not aware that it had already been highlighted. The TV programme and the website do talk about cures. It may be that there have been advances made over the last year that point towards a cure for BDC. We can only hope.

    All the best
    Ron

    in reply to: Options for Chemotherapy #15848
    ron-smith
    Member

    Susie

    I was reading this article in the Bradenton Herald just before logging on to this site. I hope this is of use to you.

    All the best

    Ron

    Posted on Monday, June 04, 2007reprint or license print email Digg it del.icio.us AIM Pill helps liver cancer patients live longer
    Specialists say drug will change the way patients are treated
    By LINDSEY TANNER
    Associated Press

    CHICAGO –For the first time, doctors say they have found a pill that improves survival in liver cancer, a notoriously hard to treat disease diagnosed in more than half a million people globally each year.

    The results in a multinational study of 602 patients with advanced liver cancer are impressive and likely will change the way patients are treated, cancer specialists including the study authors say.

    Patients got either two tablets daily of a drug called sorafenib or dummy pills in the study, which started in March 2005. Some patients are still alive, although on average, sorafenib patients survived 10.7 months versus almost 8 months for those on dummy pills. That’s a difference of 44 percent, or about three months.

    That type of survival advantage “has never happened” with liver cancer “and is a major breakthrough in the management of the disease,” said Dr. Josep Llovet, the lead author.

    “That may not sound like a lot of time,” but for liver cancer, “this is actually a quite impressive gain,” said Dr. Nancy Davidson of Johns Hopkins’ Bloomberg School of Public Health. “It is the first effective systemic treatment for liver cancer, which is such a huge problem internationally.”

    Sorafenib attacks cancer with a targeted double-barreled approach. It zeros in on malignant cells themselves and cuts off the blood supply feeding the tumor. It is believed to work on tumors within the liver and those that have spread elsewhere.

    In the study, tumors didn’t shrink or disappear but in many cases they also didn’t grow.

    “You are not curing the disease but you are delaying the progression of the disease significantly and strikingly,” said Llovet, of Mount Sinai School of Medicine in New York and Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Spain.

    The study was halted early, in February, because of the good results, and patients on dummy pills were switched to sorafenib.

    “This is a very good step forward in this disease,” said Dr. Emily Chan of Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center in Nashville, Tenn.

    Results were prepared for release Monday in Chicago at the American Society of Clinical Oncology’s annual meeting.

    The drug, sold under the brand name Nexavar, is approved in the United States and dozens of other countries to treat advanced kidney cancer. It is marketed by Bayer Pharmaceuticals Corp. and Onyx Pharmaceuticals Inc., which funded the liver cancer study. They hope to receive approval for liver cancer use from U.S. and foreign regulators.

    Llovet has done consulting for the sponsors.

    Liver cancer is diagnosed in about 19,000 Americans annually but is much more common elsewhere and is the fifth most common cancer globally. Risk factors include chronic liver infections and some forms of hepatitis. The disease is common in China and countries without widespread use of the hepatitis B vaccine, which is routinely given to U.S. infants.

    Liver cancer doesn’t respond well to conventional chemotherapy and is often diagnosed too late for surgery to be an option. Many patients die within a year of diagnosis.

    Robert Throckmorton, a 73-year-old attorney in Orange County, Calif., said his doctor told him “You better get your affairs in order” after he was diagnosed with inoperable liver cancer last August.

    But then the doctor offered sorafenib off-label, and Throckmorton readily agreed. He did not take part in the study.

    After nine months on the drug, Throckmorton said his cancer shows no sign of progression and he has no significant side effects. He said he walks three miles six days a week to stay active and feels fine.

    Instead of thinking about wills and funerals, Throckmorton is looking forward to get-togethers with his eight children and 18 grandchildren, and even a possible church trip to Uruguay with his wife.

    “I have good energy,” Throckmorton said. “We are optimistic.”

    in reply to: Post-resection chemotherapy trial #15618
    ron-smith
    Member

    Kris

    Sorry I did not get back to you earlier but I have just been released from my local hospital after spending about a week there with suspected heart problems. This started last Friday when I statrted having sharp chest and back pains. After many tests and discussions with Professor Evans at the Beatson, the doctors are of the opinion that the Xeloda brought on spasms of one of my arteries and this caused the pain. It was similar to the artery having narrowed. Anyway, I stopped taking the Xeloda on Saturday and this will continue until my next appointment with Professor Evans on 5 June.

    Information about the trial is available from CancerBACUP (Tel: 0808 800 1236) or on their website at:

    http://www.cancerbacup.org.uk

    I believe that Prof Garden is directly involved with the trial and that Edinburgh Royal is due to participate in it.

    My surgery was done by Mr Powell on each occasion. I certainly have nothing but praise for the standard of care I have received in Edinburgh. The Royal is the Centre of Excellence for liver work and transplants in Scotland. You could not have been in better hands.

    The best of luck to you.

    Ron

    in reply to: Post-resection chemotherapy trial #15616
    ron-smith
    Member

    Hi Jeff

    Thanks for your good wishes.

    I will not be receiving any additional chemo as this is a clinical trial to see the effects of giving chemotherapy after surgery. I believe Xeloda was chosen since it has been shown to be successful following surgery for colorectal and breast cancers. I don’t know but, is there a similarity between the cancer cells for these diseases and cholangiocarcinoma? At the end of the trial it will be seen if giving chemo has been an advantage, detrimental or makes no difference.

    I know that in the USA, chemo is given in some cases but has there ever been any scientific trials to show if it works?

    All the best

    Ron

    in reply to: Discomfort when sitting #14369
    ron-smith
    Member

    Hi Jeff

    I remember having to drink Fleet the day before having a colonoscopy last year. As it said on the instruction leaflet – do not stray far from a toilet once you start drinking. By the end of the day I was but a shadow of the man I used to be. This is definately one product that does what it says on the box!

    All the best

    Ron

    in reply to: My Mum #15656
    ron-smith
    Member

    Kate

    I am so sorry to read the sad news about your mother. She sems to have been a fighter and, I imagine, a bit of a free spirit. While this is obviously a devastating time for you and your family, I am sure you will have such fond memories of your mum and her influence on your lives, that will bring you joy and comfort in the future.

    Recently, I was feeling a bit down and I received a lot of support from my friends on this site. I am reminded of one thing you wrote to me and I now return it…BLESS

    My thoughts are with you.

    Kind regards

    Ron

    ron-smith
    Member

    Janet

    I was very sorry to read your posting about your mother. Not just because of the diagnosis you have been given but also the obvious anger and helplessness you are feeling.

    Let me start by saying that I am not an expert on cholangiocarcinoma. You will find many contributions on this site that are from carers and sufferers who are very knowledgeable about the medical terminology of this condition. Certainly, as time has gone on, I too have become more knowledgeable, but perhaps at this time it will be more helpful for you to try to understand the emotion and physical effects of the condition. It may also be helpful for you to read about my experiences since, as far as I am aware, I am the only member who lives and is being treated in Scotland.

    I am 56 years old and live in Stirlingshire. In June 2006 was referred by my GP to Falkirk Infirmary for an ultra-sound scan to confirm I had gallstones. During the scan the radiologist noticed something strange on my liver. I was not told about it until my GP called me to the surgery and told me that he was arranging for a CT scan. This was nothing to worry about as scans often show shadows or marks that mean nothing. However, by the time I received the appointment for the CT Scan in July the GP had already arranged an appointment with a gastroenterologist to discuss the scans with me. So, by the time I had my appointment with Dr Law, the GI consultant, in the middle of July, he was able to tell me that I had a tumour growing in my liver. The prognosis was not considered to be good and he certainly would not give me any encouragement that I would see my 60th birthday. At that stage I knew nothing about liver cancer but the news that I probably would not last another 4 years really brought it home to me. Anyway, Dr Law advised me that I would have to undergo many tests to confirm the type of cancer and to confirm if it was a primary cancer or, what is much more common, a secondary cancer that had spread from another site. The difference in the treatment of a primary or a secondary cancer is significant. The primary site must be cleared first and there is no point in trying to treat the liver until the primary site has been dealt with. Dr Law also told me that he would be sending my scans and his report to the surgeons at the Royal Edinburgh Infirmary (REI). I subsequently learned that REI is the liver centre and transplant centre for Scotland. I do not know about the hospitals in Glasgow area, apart from the Beatson Clinic which is the oncology centre for Scotland. Once the scans were sent to REI they would assess if the tumour could be operated on. Again, Dr Law did not mince his words and made it clear to me that surgery would be the only possibility of a cure but the odds were against surgery.

    The next 2 weeks was a blur with various blood tests, endoscopy and colonoscopy. Dr Law was very good and several times telephoned me at home to make sure I was aware of upcoming appointments and to keep me up to date with the situation at REI. The appointment at REI came through before the end of July. The consultant, Mr Hidalgo, made sure I understood exactly what they knew about my condition. Even at that stage they were not absolutely sure of the type of cancer and if it was a primary or a secondary cancer. The only way they would have concrete information would be to do a biopsy. This would be a last resort since it is done using a long needle and the danger is that cancer cells can seep out when they withdraw the needle. However, given the information they had accumulated, the condition of my liver (apart from the tumour), my general state of health and my age they felt they would want to operate and try to remove the tumour. Technically, this is a partial hepatic resection. This can only be attempted if the cancer is confined to one lobe of the liver and is not too close to main blood arteries.

    On 18 August I went through surgery at the hands of Mr Powell, a colleague of Mr Hidalgo, who is also a member of the liver and transplant team. I spent 5 days in REI and was released to recover at home. I now knew that I had intra-hepatic cholangiocarcinoma which is one of the rarest forms of cancer. Even in the USA there are very few cases, most of which present too late to be treated, and so the skill and knowledge available to the medical profession is, by necessity, quite limited. I felt really good and, if you read my early postings, you will see that I was very confident about the future. I had expected to receive chemotherapy after the surgery but this is not considered to be helpful for this type of cancer and can do more harm than good.

    In February 2007 I returned to REI for my first follow-up CT scan. I felt great and really had been neither up nor down since August. I was back at work full-time, walked at least 3 miles every day and was getting back to my pre-op state of fitness. You can imagine the shock when Mr Powell told me that the scans showed that the cancer had returned. He could not tell if this was cells that had been missed in August or if the original cancer had actually been a secondary cancer and this was the primary spreading again. I have to say that at that stage I felt angry. Had a mess been made of the surgery? Should I have received chemotherapy? Should I have had a CT scan sooner? Within a fortnight I was sent to Aberdeen for a PET Scan which it was hoped would identify if there was cancer anywhere else or if it was just in my liver. In March Mr Powell was able to tell me that the scan showed 6 lesions on my right lobe (the one that was resected). His plan now was to remove the whole of the right lobe. This would leave about 30% of my liver but, because it is in good condition and again because of my age and general health and finally, because of the unusually good recovery I made from the original surgery, the remaining liver should recover and handle my body’s needs. Note the word is SHOULD. You quickly learn there are no guarantees with this condition.

    On 29 March I was back in theatre and woke up in recovery to be told that the operation had been successful. 6 days later I was home but this time has been harder to get over. OK, it is major surgery, I think I was in theatre for over 6 hours. A vey large part of the largest organ in my body was removed. But I think there is more to it than that. I have always tried to be very positive. Always joked with the medical staff. Tried to keep the spirits of my fellow patients up. But this is draining. Add to that the shock of the initial diagnosis, the trauma of the first surgery, the euphoria of it’s success, the stunning shock of the second diagnosis and further trauma of surgery. It is not easy to handle or to get over. I have an appointment with Mr Powell next week and we will be discussing chemotherapy. He is still not convinced that it will do any good but he will refer me to the Beatson to use their expertise. They may well feel that it is likely to do more harm than good or they may decide to offer it to me. I don’t know but, just now, my feeling is that I will be willing to try anything if it gives me any chance of not having to go through surgery again.

    I don’t know if my experience is typical of everyone in Scotland or if I have been exceptionally lucky with the people who have treated me over the last few months. What I did find was that as soon as the word cancer was mentioned, things happened very quickly. I have not been aware of egos getting in the way of the treatment I have been given. You will find, by reading the various posts from members in the USA, that the whole ethos is different compared with the UK. In the USA it is not uncommon for patients to travel all over the country to seek treatment. They inevitably loose continuity of treatment and confidence being built up with their medical professionals. This method is made possible because of private medical insurance. Is it better than the NHS? I can’t answer that but I have not been made aware of a lack of treatment and a reticence amongst the doctors to seek advice or assistance from more experienced colleagues. I live in Forth Valley area but have been treated there as well as Lothian, Grampian and, shortly, Strathclyde. So the post code does not appear to have influenced anything. I would be niaive to think that my age and general health have not influenced my treatment. But, by the same token. I am sure in my own mind that had I been 20 years older with poorer health, I would have found it very difficult to come through the treatment.

    You may have been given more information about your mother’s condition. Is it primary or secondary? Is it liver cancer or bile duct cancer? What stage is the cancer? I don’t know enough about the various treatments to comment of the fact that she seems to be receiving steroids. Was a reason for this treatment given? The doctors may also have a problem with confidentiality that prevents them from discussing her condition and treatment with you before they can discuss it with her. My advice is to be receptive to what the doctors are telling you. Don’t assume that they are hiding things from you or trying to hide their own lack of experience. Try to learn as much as possible about the condition so that you can ask questions. I realise that this is very hard for you but sometimes no treatment gives the patient a better standard of life than chemo. Again, you will read posts on this site where people have made that decision. It is such a personal thing that no one can make that decision for the patient.

    I appreciate that much of what I have written may not be too relevant to your own situation but I hope it gives you a bit of an insight into this dreadful disease and the effect it has on people. You may feel you are alone and certainly, there are not many of us in this small country. But my experience is that Scotland maintains a very high standard in treatment and care. If there is anything in particular that you feel I may be able to answer please just ask.

    Best wishes

    Ron

    in reply to: Here we go again! #15405
    ron-smith
    Member

    Thanks for your good wishes Kate. I think most credit must go to the skill of Jim Powell, my surgeon and the anaesthetics team as well as the care of the nursing staff. Perhaps being a typical cantankerous Scot also helps a bit!

    My main concern regarding Margaret’s gallstone is that is what they thought I had before my first diagnosis and I think that is quite common. She has an appointment with her GP later this week so we should find out how and when it will be treated.

    I don’t think the hernia has any effect it was just the fact that I had assumed my early bouts of heartburn were the result of gallstones or the cc. And anyway, they had already given me plenty of bad news so I am sure I could have taken this bit. See, told you, cantankerous!

    All the best

    Ron

    in reply to: My Mum #15555
    ron-smith
    Member

    Sarah

    I should say that I generally find it very difficult to read through postings in this particular section and normally I stop midway. This may well be due to the fact that I am reading about the disease that affects me. However, on this occasion I just had to read your post all the way through. It was very moving but there was also so much of it that I recognised. The emotions that run through your mind – anger, fear, confusion, disbelief that this is happening to you. The feeling of total helplessness you suffer, whether you are the patient or carer. The overwhelming sense that the doctors are not telling you everything or doing everything they can as quickly as they can. I am sure they were as desperate to help as you and your familly were, but there is so little real understanding of this terrible disease. Also, unfortunately, as was the case with your mother, the symptoms do not present until it is too late. So time is too short to affect any form of cure or improvement and also to allow any form of research. I don’t know if you and your familly will ever get over these feelings. All I can offer is to try to be thankful that your mother’s suffering, both emotional and physical, is over. I am sure that your plan to do work for the Cancer Foundation will be a great help to you. It will also help anyone you are in contact with who is affected by cancer. There is nothing so helpful as speaking with someone who has personal experience.

    My very best wishes to you and your familly.

    Ron

Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 130 total)